Posted on 12/10/2016 7:23:49 AM PST by SeekAndFind
This one has always been a huge question mark for me.How does one building stand after a fire and another implode immediately?
https://more911.wordpress.com/wtc7-building7/
Building 7
World Trade Centre Build 7 (WTC 7) also known as “The Solomon’s Building” aka Building 7 was the third building to be destroyed on September 11th, 2001. It was a 47 story high steel frame building. The most salient question is; what caused Building 7 to fall at [1] freefall speeds for 8 stores? The building was not hit by any aeroplanes and there were no large raging fires. But yet it fell, fast and symmetrically into its own footprint. a few but limited fires.
Watch the 8 floors of free fall that starts off Building 7’s destruction:
Do the fires in the clip below look like they are endangering Building 7?
Did the fires you have just seen, cause 8 floors of free fall and the total destruction of Building 7, or not? That is the question, how can you find the answer?
First, what is freefall?
It’s not a speed, it’s an acceleration, an object getting fast and faster.
Free fall can only be obtained if there is nothing below a dropped object to slow it down.
More technically, it’s gravitational acceleration at 9.81 meters squared.
What then was holding Building 7 up?
Building 7 Typical floor plan
An exoskeleton of 57 steel columns.
Plus 22 steel columns for internal concrete clad lift shaft and fire escape stairwells.
In all a total of 79 steel columns plus concrete.
With reference to the above, the refined question being asked is?
What could simultaneous and symmetrical cause the removal of 57 external steel columns and 22 internal columns for lift shafts and fireproof stairwells?
There are two competing theories:
Fire causing collapse.
Demolition explosives causing collapse.
Q.
How can you evaluate these theories?
A.
By looking at the extent of damage to steel framed buildings after known fires.
By looking at examples of successful and failed demolitions using explosives
A Look at building fires:
al-tayer-tower-2012
Al Tayer Tower 2012. I count 39 visible stores standing after the blaze. Click for Video
24 hours of fire madrid-windsor-tower-after
Windsor Building, 2005 Madrid. Burns for 24 hours. Click for Video
jianye-building-in-yuexiu-distric-15th-dec-2013-on-fire jianye-building-in-yuexiu-distric-15th-dec-2013-after
Jianye Building, 2013 in Yuexiu district China. Burns for 12 hours. Click for cell phone Video
mandarin-oriental-2009-40-stories
Hotel Mandarin Oriental, 2009 Beijing. 40 stories burn overnight. Click for video
wtc7-what-next
Building 7, 2001 New York. 8 scattered floors burn for 4 hours. Click for video
wtc7-what-you-would-expect
Building 7, 2001 New York. To the right shows what engineers would expect to be left afterwards, but bellow shows what was actually found aftwards. See WTC7 free fall video.
building-7-rubble-pile
A Look at demolitions:
wtc-no-8-floor-gapwtc-8-floor-gap
Some common demolition traits are:
Sudden onset
Symmetrical fall for a number of floors
Freefall speeds for a number of floors
Pulverisation of concrete and other materials
Thick dust clouds
Horizontal ejections
Remember the Build 7 destruction shows 8 floors of freefall (i.e. the gap on the left).
Red Road Flats, 2015 Glasgow. Look for the aprox 5 floors exploded on each tower block.
Building 7, 2001 New York. Side by side to known controlled demolitions.
Conclusion:
Where is the integrity of the news reporters, engineers, architects… who know that there are glaring flaws in the NIST report into the collapse of Building 7, but fail to point them out?
Are those that promote the “conspiracy theory” meme i.e. conflating unrelated events together themselves guilty of perverting the course of justice by preventing open debate and analysis? Do you know someone who does this? If so, challenge them. Show them the evidence and given them a chance to stop protecting murderers.
[1] page 45, NIST NCSTAR 1A Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7
This one has always been a huge question mark for me.How does one building stand after a fire and another implode immediately?
https://more911.wordpress.com/wtc7-building7/
Building 7
World Trade Centre Build 7 (WTC 7) also known as “The Solomon’s Building” aka Building 7 was the third building to be destroyed on September 11th, 2001. It was a 47 story high steel frame building. The most salient question is; what caused Building 7 to fall at [1] freefall speeds for 8 stores? The building was not hit by any aeroplanes and there were no large raging fires. But yet it fell, fast and symmetrically into its own footprint. a few but limited fires.
Watch the 8 floors of free fall that starts off Building 7’s destruction:
Do the fires in the clip below look like they are endangering Building 7?
Did the fires you have just seen, cause 8 floors of free fall and the total destruction of Building 7, or not? That is the question, how can you find the answer?
First, what is freefall?
It’s not a speed, it’s an acceleration, an object getting fast and faster.
Free fall can only be obtained if there is nothing below a dropped object to slow it down.
More technically, it’s gravitational acceleration at 9.81 meters squared.
What then was holding Building 7 up?
Building 7 Typical floor plan
An exoskeleton of 57 steel columns.
Plus 22 steel columns for internal concrete clad lift shaft and fire escape stairwells.
In all a total of 79 steel columns plus concrete.
With reference to the above, the refined question being asked is?
What could simultaneous and symmetrical cause the removal of 57 external steel columns and 22 internal columns for lift shafts and fireproof stairwells?
There are two competing theories:
Fire causing collapse.
Demolition explosives causing collapse.
Q.
How can you evaluate these theories?
A.
By looking at the extent of damage to steel framed buildings after known fires.
By looking at examples of successful and failed demolitions using explosives
A Look at building fires:
al-tayer-tower-2012
Al Tayer Tower 2012. I count 39 visible stores standing after the blaze. Click for Video
24 hours of fire madrid-windsor-tower-after
Windsor Building, 2005 Madrid. Burns for 24 hours. Click for Video
jianye-building-in-yuexiu-distric-15th-dec-2013-on-fire jianye-building-in-yuexiu-distric-15th-dec-2013-after
Jianye Building, 2013 in Yuexiu district China. Burns for 12 hours. Click for cell phone Video
mandarin-oriental-2009-40-stories
Hotel Mandarin Oriental, 2009 Beijing. 40 stories burn overnight. Click for video
wtc7-what-next
Building 7, 2001 New York. 8 scattered floors burn for 4 hours. Click for video
wtc7-what-you-would-expect
Building 7, 2001 New York. To the right shows what engineers would expect to be left afterwards, but bellow shows what was actually found aftwards. See WTC7 free fall video.
building-7-rubble-pile
A Look at demolitions:
wtc-no-8-floor-gapwtc-8-floor-gap
Some common demolition traits are:
Sudden onset
Symmetrical fall for a number of floors
Freefall speeds for a number of floors
Pulverisation of concrete and other materials
Thick dust clouds
Horizontal ejections
Remember the Build 7 destruction shows 8 floors of freefall (i.e. the gap on the left).
Red Road Flats, 2015 Glasgow. Look for the aprox 5 floors exploded on each tower block.
Building 7, 2001 New York. Side by side to known controlled demolitions.
Conclusion:
Where is the integrity of the news reporters, engineers, architects… who know that there are glaring flaws in the NIST report into the collapse of Building 7, but fail to point them out?
Are those that promote the “conspiracy theory” meme i.e. conflating unrelated events together themselves guilty of perverting the course of justice by preventing open debate and analysis? Do you know someone who does this? If so, challenge them. Show them the evidence and given them a chance to stop protecting murderers.
[1] page 45, NIST NCSTAR 1A Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7
They couldn’t find any information on The Clinton violation of the Espionage Act! Then they come up with this crap? CIA=Clinton Intelligence Assclowns!!!
Different time zones, maybe, with a different market.
WSJ did print two different editions on this issue.
As you posted, WHY?
Is that the same CIA that is headed by a muslim appointee of obama? It is. Ok.
Most people would probably be somewhat surprised if they were ever told who was working at places like the CIA, FBI, DOJ, etc. One friend of mine, who is in federal service told me that they were amazed at how many Bernie stickers they saw in the parking lots. I guess if you’re on the government dole, living/working in DC, it’s easy to go that route.
And the CIA is no different. Remember, not everyone who works there is some James Bond/Jason Bourne, patriot that loves this country. Lots of young, fresh out of college. liberals doing all sorts of work there.
Why does it seem Trump is not worried by this 2 pronged attempt to steal the Presidency? Front 1 is the recount. Front 2 is to invalidate the election results saying Russia interfered.
Trump needs to clean house.
Specifics please.
People who actually understand how the system works aren’t freaking over recounts or “invalidated” results.
Any true evidence can be presented to the public to influence the Electoral College, or to Congress to overrule the Electoral College. Anonymous sources citing unreliable evidence is not a legal standard.
No savvy Democrat wants a do over.
What we have here is a lot of MSM and RINO masks falling off, and that’s good.
Trump will be FIRING a whole lot of ineffectual bureaucrats @ CIA, DOJ, State Dept, IRS, ..... etc., soon!
Seth Rich is unavailable for comment.
And Idiot Drudge Blares the lie from his site as if its fact, and links to the Washington Post and Politico. He can be a F****** Moron.
First... good! Second... it never happened... Third... McCain needs to find a nice assisted living place and check himself in...
More fake news. Defund NPR and see if they can compete on their own.
5.56mm
Revenge and self protection - powerful motives, so he makes a good case.
As you pointed out - the real problem is that classified information was on a server that could be hacked so easily. More than likely it was not just the Russians that hacked it.
This is the way the Clinton's always handle their scandals. Point to a distraction or point the finger at someone else. The press is always happy to talk about the distraction ad-nauseum.
Because the leaks were all on the DNC and not Republicans, we are to assume this was the Russians. Meanwhile they don’t assume Hillary’s SOS emails were hacked by Russians?
Meanwhile 95% of the media are on an all out one way assault on the Republican. They generate fake news called polls.
#snopesisfake
“Thanks, ReaganGeneration2 & H/T WildHighlander57”
BUMP!
Is it time for President Trump in 2017 to end the CIA?
President Truman did not trust the OSS and its increasing power.
At the end of WWII, he signed an ExO ending the OSS.
September 20, 1945, President Truman signed Executive Order 9621, terminating the OSS. His Order became effective October 1, 1945. In the days following, the functions of the OSS were split between the Department of State and the Department of War.
The State Department received the Research and Analysis Branch of OSS (originally created by Edward Mead Earle[28]) which was renamed the Interim Research and Intelligence Service or IRIS,[29] headed by U.S. Army Colonel Alfred McCormack. Later it was renamed the Bureau of Intelligence and Research by the State Department.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Strategic_Service
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.