Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING NEWS: CLIMATE SCARE IS OVER!
millie weaver ^ | 12/8/2016 | Lord Christopher Monckton

Posted on 12/08/2016 5:51:24 PM PST by Coffee_drinker

video: Published on Dec 8, 2016 Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver interviews Lord Christopher Monckton who reveals a breaking discovery which may prove the entire 'climate change' scare is based on faulty mathematics. At the "Global-Warming; an Inconvenient Lie" conference in Phoenix, AZ Lord Monckton covers in depth the mathematical discovery his team has made and announces that these findings have been submitted for proper peer review.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: agw; climate; climatechange; globalwarming; lordmonckton; math; monckton; trumpisstillwinning; trumpwinsagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: umgud
"How much does a cubic meter (or yard) of atmosphere weigh?"

A column of atmosphere starting at sea level and extending up until there is no more atmosphere weighs 14.7 lbs.

41 posted on 12/08/2016 6:29:14 PM PST by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
How much does a cubic meter (or yard) of atmosphere weigh?

That depends on what planet you're on.

On every planet with an atmosphere, the closer you are to the surface the higher the pressure, thicker the atmosphere, the greater the weight.

This is why chimneys work. The air pressure at the top is less than the air pressure on the bottom where the fire is, so there is an updraft. This only works if the chimney is air tight in it's entire length.

42 posted on 12/08/2016 6:29:28 PM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Coffee_drinker

Bump for later.


43 posted on 12/08/2016 6:29:44 PM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
How much does a cubic meter (or yard) of atmosphere weigh?

At sea level, at a temperature of 15°C, a cubic meter of atmosphere weighs 1.225 kilogram, or 2.70 pounds.

A cubic yard of atmosphere under the same conditions weighs 0.937 kilograms, or 2.06 pounds.

44 posted on 12/08/2016 6:31:18 PM PST by Steely Tom ([VOTE FRAUD] == [CIVIL WAR])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Temperature solubility feedback though. The modeling is not easy.


45 posted on 12/08/2016 6:31:22 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech
1. The total atmosphere weighs 1,800,000 BILLION tons.

2. CO2 is .04% of that which is 720 billion tons.

Forgive me because I'm not good at math, but if the total atmosphere weighs 1.8 billion tons and CO2 is 720 billion tons, is something off here? Did you perhaps have a typo and the total atmosphere is 1.8 trillion tons? Thanks for any clarification you can offer.

46 posted on 12/08/2016 6:31:22 PM PST by Avalon Memories (Deplorables of the world, unite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom
Climate scare is not over.

You're right. They will just morph it into some other phrasing. First it was global cooling, then global warming, then the very amorphous "climate change." The climate changes every single day, so what the heck they mean by "climate change" is anyone's guess. Literally a guess.

47 posted on 12/08/2016 6:34:15 PM PST by Avalon Memories (Deplorables of the world, unite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Flint

per sq in


48 posted on 12/08/2016 6:34:32 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Avalon Memories

1.8 <> 1,800,000


49 posted on 12/08/2016 6:35:38 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

I wish I could say I thought this would get any largesr exposure but it won’t.
In other words don’t expect Ivanka to going into the elevator with this guy.
And no hope for any MSM sadly.


50 posted on 12/08/2016 6:36:16 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

Yeah, otherwise your house burns down and there are no more fires in the place.


51 posted on 12/08/2016 6:37:45 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Coffee_drinker
Lord Christopher Monckton

I will await the publication of the paper and hope that he is correct. But, I will note that the guy is a hoot. He uses a term, QUANGO - which is and acronym used derisively by the British for "quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization."

Quangos it turns out are a nuisance. According to the UK Tax Payers Alliance, in the year 2006-07, tax payers funded 1,162 Quangos at a cost of nearly £64bn; equivalent to £2,550 per household.

Examples of quangos include: Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Advisory Body, Learning & Skills Improvement Service, the Institute for Learning, and Standards and Verification UK, Carbon Trust (which it is noted could be merged into new UK Green Investment Bank).

The term was first used, actually in the US by the Carnegie Foundation. I would be curious to know if quangos are a significant issue here. I would note that £2,550 per household to support quangos in UK is an alarming amount of money.

52 posted on 12/08/2016 6:37:51 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lefty-lie-spy

Those people are like Michael Myers from Halloween. You keep killing them and they keep coming back.


53 posted on 12/08/2016 6:40:01 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I prefer to drink a bunch of them. Stay thirsty my FRiends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

Excellent post.


54 posted on 12/08/2016 6:40:21 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
The thing that has surprised folks is the speed at which CO2 is taken up by plants to fix the Carbon and release the oxygen.

Almost as if the plants were designed(or adapted) to deal with large variations in 'climate'.

55 posted on 12/08/2016 6:41:55 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Those people are like Michael Myers from Halloween. You keep killing them and they keep coming back.


56 posted on 12/08/2016 6:43:09 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I prefer to drink a bunch of them. Stay thirsty my FRiends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

funny thing about evolution. It’s a lot more robust and adaptive than people give it credit for.


57 posted on 12/08/2016 6:43:59 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Coffee_drinker
The whole "climate" game will be the last game the liberals will ever give up. To win the "climate game" allows liberals to control population growth, expansion, and virtually every aspect of the economy through indirect regulations.

The left will refuse, absolutely REFUSE to give up the "green" or "climate" efforts.

58 posted on 12/08/2016 6:44:34 PM PST by Solson (Trump 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
1.8 <> 1,800,000

I'm truly not good at math, so don't understand that. The original post said 1,800,000 billion for the first number and 720 billion for the second number. Isn't 1,800,000 written numerically the same as one million, 800 thousand written textually? If yes, isn't the first number 1.8 trillion, not billion? If yes, then when written numerically, shouldn't it be 1,800,000,000?

59 posted on 12/08/2016 6:44:55 PM PST by Avalon Memories (Deplorables of the world, unite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

Yes; but the composition of the atmosphere (as well as its height) differs from planet to planet; as does the force of gravity. ;-)


60 posted on 12/08/2016 6:47:24 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson