Michigan
A statewide hand recount of Michigans roughly 2.8 million ballots that began on Monday is now up in the air as a federal judge will hold a hearing Wednesday on whether to stop it.
The state elections board also is meeting Wednesday, a day after the Michigan appeals court ordered it to dismiss Stein’s recount petition, claiming she has no standing. The court noted that she received 1 percent of the vote and has no chance of catching Trump, who narrowly defeated Clinton in the state. A federal judge takes up the matter next.
According to the certified results from late November, Trump won the state by about 10,700 votes or about two-tenths of a percentage point. The recount so far was looking at eight counties, including the states largest, Wayne.
The “recounts” are only the first step by the left. If the recount doesn’t reverse the result, then the left will then sue to have, 1) conservative blocks of ballots disqualified, 2) “undervotes” examined for possible “intent” for Hillary, 3) entire voting districts disqualified (in conservative areas) because of some imagined “fraud.”
Reminds me of the Democratic Party presidential primary in Kentucky this year. Hillary Clinton squeaked out a narrow victory, and all the Bernouts started shrieking about a recount. The recanvass happened and Sanders lost by a bigger margin.
The good part is the sound of liberals filling their depends.
Uh Oh: Half Of Detroit’s Ballots Might Be Disqualified Due To Errors
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/12/06/uh-oh-half-of-detroits-ballots-might-be-disqualified-due-to-ballot-errors-n2256152?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
Why should a recount be preferred over the original count?
ML/NJ
With the recount, Trump GAINED votes...hmmm. Thank you Jill and Hill, Trump got more votes that he thought.