Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Master Persuader laying the table.
1 posted on 12/04/2016 11:27:46 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t see any problem with this what so ever. Before the Neo-Cons start squawking about Reagan, it is important to remember that Reagan was no free trader. He was a protectionist and used voluntary import quotas and tariffs to cajole foreign car makers to move their production to the U.S. the entire Southern auto industry along with Ohio Honda are a direct result of Reagan protectionism.


2 posted on 12/04/2016 11:34:00 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump is dealing with a group of “college graduates” now running much of our nation’s remaining manufacturing who were “educated” at our Marxist colleges and universities that it’s “the dollar uber alles!” What has always amazed me is that at the end of the day, the fired workers are the customers for their products. It seems that they think it’s a “good deal” to fire American workers then sell them “lower-priced products” made outside the country. Carried to the extreme, the have cheaper products but no one who has a job to afford to buy them at any price. It’s time the globalists get a real haircut.
And the other piece of this is that foreign competitor’s products should be tariffed so they are not “less expensive” than their American-made competition’s.


3 posted on 12/04/2016 11:35:07 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What an interesting approach. To my knowledge the trade agreements, like GATT and NAFTA prevent the president from imposing tariffs on products coming into the country from our trading partners. The idea of imposing tariffs on products produced by American companies overseas is most likely not in the wording of those agreements and would not invoke the penalty clauses. (If this is the case, Trump has out nuanced all the liberal pundits. They can eat verbiage.)


5 posted on 12/04/2016 11:38:26 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“In a series of early morning tweets Sunday, Trump said companies with offshore factories would face a 35% tax on products they want to sell back in the U.S.”

Hey Fortune, Trump’s been saying that for a year and a half.

Where you been degenerates?


7 posted on 12/04/2016 11:39:58 AM PST by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Make it an even 40%!


8 posted on 12/04/2016 11:41:11 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The U.S. is going to substantialy [sic] reduce taxes and regulations on businesses, but any business that leaves our country for another country, fires its employees, builds a new factory or plant in the other country, and then thinks it will sell its products back into the U.S. without retribution or consequences, is WRONG!” the president-elect wrote.

Good. This is one of things that gave us Trump.

9 posted on 12/04/2016 11:41:36 AM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why wouldn’t the company simply decide to reincorporate as a Mexican company, since only American companies are subject to this tax


10 posted on 12/04/2016 11:47:02 AM PST by ari-freedom (Chicken Little Concerned for Trump people are almost as annoying as NeverTrumpers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
NO!

Protective tariffs are self-inflicted gun shots inflicting the AMERICAN consumer with higher prices and thus a lower standard of living for AMERICANS. Special interests can take a flying leap.

Go after the ROOT CAUSES of business fleeing the country which is the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

- Abolish the unconstitutional federal minimum wage
- Abolish unconstitutional federal regulations
- Abolish unconstitutional federal union protection
- Abolish federal corporate taxes which is a hidden form of higher individual taxes

Don't layer more government interference on top of the problems the feds have already caused.

The Leftist and confused do-gooders' answer for government failure is always more government. Utterly stupid.

And it's not "crony capitalism" either - another Leftist term meant to confuse the issue. The issue is the GOVERNMENT, NOT "capitalism". The corrupt, unconstitutional, and bone-headed acts of federal government be and must be rejected and abolished. THAT will make America a business-friendly country and THAT is what will make America great again.

Government never has, doesn't now, and never will make America great. Freedom has, is, and always will be the source of America's greatness.

12 posted on 12/04/2016 11:50:28 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I think he’s holding back a bit....like...if I can get Congress to lower the Corporate taxes and your states siving you incentives (and all states do this), and you STILL insist on going out of the country...we’re gonna put the scr*** to you when you try to sell your stuff here.


16 posted on 12/04/2016 11:53:42 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

(1) Cut taxes, esp. corporate ones, and (2) impose tariffs on companies that leave.

LIKE THIS PLAN!


20 posted on 12/04/2016 11:55:51 AM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

One problem with this approach is that if you make it only slightly less expensive than it is overseas, you’re basically left with the option of going out of business.

Need to cut the root cause of why it’s so expensive to operate here.


23 posted on 12/04/2016 11:57:08 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
now put the same tariff on the companies that already moved
32 posted on 12/04/2016 12:11:47 PM PST by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The globalists aren’t going to like this, but as long as he keeps away from their printing press he should be okay.

Remember this gem?:

At the Bildeberg meeting in 1991 David Rockefeller walked up to Bill Clinton and asked him what he thought about NAFTA.
Clinton replied, “If it’s important to you, Mr Rockefeller, it’s important to me.”
Rockefeller replied, “Thank you, Mr President.”
- David Rockeller


43 posted on 12/04/2016 12:37:28 PM PST by Vic S ( David Rockefeller killed Larry McDonald (KAL 007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If you are a U.S. company you produce in the U.S., it is just that simple.


44 posted on 12/04/2016 12:50:51 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
like a boss photo: LIKE A BOSS tumblr_ku6b8exLrv1qa6dweo1_500.gif Mexico, NYC, et al. You don't have to like it. Just do it.
46 posted on 12/04/2016 1:11:38 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all arsmed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Businesses leave for economic reasons; they stay here for the same reasons.


51 posted on 12/04/2016 1:53:55 PM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
"Tariffs were the main source of all Federal revenue from 1790 to 1914. At the end of the American Civil War in 1865 about 63% of Federal income was generated by the excise taxes, which exceeded the 25.4% generated by tariffs. In 1915 during World War I tariffs generated only 30.1% of revenues. Since 1935 tariff income has continued to be a declining percentage of Federal tax income."

See table here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariffs_in_United_States_history

54 posted on 12/04/2016 2:13:39 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A 35% tariff on its face is pretty stupid. Will hurt all parties involved. Except of course govt. Hopefully we will reduce regs and taxes so U.S. companies can remain competitive on the world stage manufacturing.


58 posted on 12/04/2016 3:19:43 PM PST by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hasn’t he been saying this for a Year, if not more?

35% Tax on what, the actual cost of production before it is imported into this Country? Not one article clarifies what this actually means. They also never mention how OUR Product Exports are Taxed.

Funny how the Federal Government was funded only by Tariffs before 1913 when the 16th Amendment was Ratified. LOL


70 posted on 12/04/2016 7:20:21 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (One Man's Mainstream Media is another Man's Ministry of Propoganda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The solution is to make the business enviroment here so godo its’ better for them to stay than to leave.

To try to prevent businesses from leaving because of a bad business environment is as absurd and self-defeating as the Soviets building a wall so their people can’t leave.


86 posted on 12/05/2016 12:56:53 PM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson