Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Historic recount will have to move quickly (WI)
Journal-Sentinel ^ | 11/25/16 | Patrick Marley and Bill Glauber

Posted on 11/25/2016 3:38:17 PM PST by randita

Wisconsin will begin a historic presidential recount next week and the state could risk losing its ability to have its 10 electoral votes counted if it doesn't meet key deadlines next month.

Hitting a Dec. 13 deadline could be particularly tricky if Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein is able to force the recount to be conducted by hand, Wisconsin's top election official said.

Stein and independent presidential candidate Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente separately filed recount requests late Friday, the last day they were able to do so. Stein received about 30,000 votes and De La Fuente about 1,500 out of 3 million cast.

One or both of them will have to pay for the recount because they lost by more than 0.25%. The cost could top $1 million.

Stein is also planning to ask for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania, which have deadlines next week. She has raised $5 million for the recounts in recent days — more than she raised during her campaign leading up to the Nov. 8 election.

Wisconsin's recount will likely begin late next week, once the state has tallied a cost estimate and received payment from Stein's campaign, said Michael Haas, administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission. Recounts will be done by county boards of canvassers, which will likely have to work nights and weekends, Haas said.

The push for a recount came as liberals raised fears about hacked voting machines. Election officials and experts say they are unaware of any problems with Wisconsin's vote tally.

Republican Donald Trump edged out Democrat Hillary Clinton by some 27,000 votes in Wisconsin, becoming the first GOP presidential candidate to win the state since 1984.

(Excerpt) Read more at jsonline.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; 2016swingstates; election; greenparty; greenparty4clinton; jillstein; recount; shenanigans; stein; stein4clinton; steinrecount; thirdparty; wi2016; wirecount; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last
To: randita
Recounts will be done by county boards of canvassers, which will likely have to work nights and weekends, Haas said.

IF they even get that far. Each candidate can object to the recount and the boards of canvassers can make determinations of fact; it is an undisputed fact that there is no possible way for Jill Stein to gain over 1,000,000 votes to become the winner of the election, and that this recount is entirely meaningless.

Should a board (or boards) fail to agree on this minor piece of truth, I suspect that it will go to the courts.

141 posted on 11/25/2016 6:54:02 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CapnJack
“the state could risk losing its ability to have its 10 electoral votes counted if it doesn’t meet key deadlines next month.”

That is not what happened in FLA

The recount would not have been able to meet the deadline so it never started
If what is posted is true FLA would have started and then said we can't finish
142 posted on 11/25/2016 7:15:11 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: randita

From the article....”Excess money raised for the recount will go to Green Party campaign schools next year “to groom local candidates,” Martin said.”

I thought she wanted a beach house like Bernie but perhaps this would give her more power...


143 posted on 11/25/2016 7:31:56 PM PST by bronxville (Americanism not Globalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome

If they did, what do you expect from the Urinal Sentinel? Only good for starting fires, wrapping fish and lining bird cages.


144 posted on 11/26/2016 6:43:14 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randita

Completely irrelevant. Hilary has ALREADY conceded defeat to Trump. It is over. If she wanted a recount, she had to ask for one prior to conceding.

It is too late to recount other than for academic purposes. Sorry commie libs. Too late. You lost. Hilary conceded.


145 posted on 11/26/2016 11:54:54 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The GOP will see the light, because Trump will make them feel the heat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
You sure that it's the state legislature's call to make if they don't meet the deadline? Because according to the article:

"If the recount isn't complete by then, electors from Wisconsin could meet anyway and try to have their results sent to Congress by the time it counts the votes on Jan. 6, Foley said. Congress has wide latitude to decide how to count the states' electoral votes."

146 posted on 11/26/2016 2:56:56 PM PST by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC (Folks ask about my politics. I say: I dont belong to any organized political party. I'm a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

A concession speech is not any kind of legal or official action. It’s merely a formality. Plenty of sore losers have never made concession speeches. And if you will recall, in November - December 2000, Gore first conceded, then un-conceded, then eventually re-conceded.


147 posted on 11/26/2016 3:05:10 PM PST by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC (Folks ask about my politics. I say: I dont belong to any organized political party. I'm a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: okie01

thanks for that info


148 posted on 11/26/2016 4:09:46 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: meyer

You know, she might not be doing it to help Hillary. Maybe the reason the democrats didn’t do this recount crap first is because.....the knew a recount would uncover millions of voter fraud cases and wikileaks would unleash a billion emails pointing to the White House.....

shooot, i say go ahead and recount.....it will help show the world and the young people of America how hopelessly corrupt the Regressive Alt-Left Democratic Party is.


149 posted on 11/26/2016 4:22:07 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

Not sure. I was assuming the state handled it like many other states do - where it flips to the state legislature. But perhaps WI has different provisions. We’ll soon learn, I imagine.


150 posted on 11/26/2016 11:42:36 PM PST by randita (PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson