Posted on 11/25/2016 1:38:54 PM PST by dirtboy
The Commission has received the Stein and Del La Fuente recount petitions. Details and news release posted soon at http://elections.wi.gov .
SoreLoserman II
Do Stein and the other guy split the costs?
Does a candidats who received 1% of the vote have any chance of winning?
She is in no way injured at all.
I’m assuming it can be turned down.
Get to win the state twice in a year. Nice! Didn’t even think it would have happened once. I wonder if they can do an election desk again and get all the reactions live one more time. Try to still this from Trump and 1776 it is. We did it fairly at the ballot box, if they don’t accept that then all bets are off
Should be relatively easy to find all the votes from these two clowns and then find enough Hillary or Trump votes to prove they lost. That is the purpose of a recount. I do not think they need to spend the money to recount everything. :)
I expect to hear of “found” ballot boxes, however.
12 minutes to the deadline?
There should be a national referendum vote on what to do about George Soros.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/25/jill-stein-raises-more-funds-for-recount-than-entire-presidential-campaign.html
Sounds like the petition will be considered and acted on. Which hopefully means it could be denied if there is no proof of irregularities.
WI has 10 electoral votes, they can recount there until the world ends and Trump will still be the winner.
From one or more of the following:
1. prosecute him
2. revoke his citizenship and deport him
3. seize his assets
4. make an example of him for others who might want to copycat his deeds
Who cares? They sucked in millions from brain dead Liberals who now won’t be able to buy Christmas presents. This is going nowhere.
According to an email from the Wisconsin election commission to the county clerks, under Wisconsin law, any candidate can file for a recount. The appellant has to post bond equal to the estimated cost of the recount before the recount can begin. The election commission is asking clerks to make a good faith estimate of their costs, and providing some guidance. So they do not have an estimate yet, but it will be expensive. If appellant prevails, the bond is refunded.
I posted elsewhere . . . just went thru the WI recount manual.
1) In the absence of a court order requiring hand count, the recount can use machine tabulators (originally used).
2) All candidates must be informed of a recount and all can object to a recount taking place — and provide evidence supporting their objection (like Stein can’t win).
3) The only danger I see is rejected absentee ballots and rejected provisional ballots are re-examined to see if they should be included. Those that were accepted are NOT re-examined to see if they should be rejected.
Deliver him to Putin.
WI has 10 electoral votes, they can recount there until the world ends and Trump will still be the winner.
***************
Don’t they have to flip all three states to get Trump below the EC votes to win?
So it’s one at a time filing ending next week.
I’m kind of surprised there weren’t demands for more recounts. Russia you know, hacked this whole election for Donald Trump. But there doesn’t seem to be a lot of protesting in the streets about that for some reason.
The only way they net 30000 votes there is if THEY cheat. Period
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.