Posted on 11/25/2016 9:57:05 AM PST by dirtboy
Jill Stein, the green partys candidate in the US presidential election, is due to formally file a motion for a recount in Wisconsin on Friday as her funding effort for counting the votes again in three states passed $4.9m.
As more money flooded in for her effort which aims to fund recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, all states where Donald Trump narrowly beat Hillary Clinton she admitted she had no hard evidence of fraud but said the systems were vulnerable.
Her campaign team said it would formally file in Wisconsin before the 5pm ET deadline to do so; the recount motion deadlines for the other two states are next week.
The fundraising site explained that Steins campaign could not guarantee any of these states would have a recount. We can only pledge we will demand recounts in those states, the site said. If we raise more than whats needed, the surplus will also go toward election integrity efforts and to promote voting system reform.
Her effort has split liberals, with some energized by the potential to show defeated Democrat Clinton is the rightful election winner, and those who see Steins intervention as an expensive gimmick to promote the Green party.
On Friday, Stein said she was acting due to compelling evidence of voting anomalies and that data analysis had indicated significant discrepancies in vote totals that were released by state authorities.
We do not have a smoking gun, Stein told CNN. On the other hand, we have a system that invites hacking, tampering and malfeasance.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
How friggin’ long do we have to wait till the Trump camp chimes in on this.I am getting pissed by the hour
I'm on this one. You're the one who is playing around with fantasy when it comes to FEC filings for hard money contributions to federal campaigns.
Campaign attorneys need to be paid!
Sec of State in WI, PA, and MI are all Dems. SoS certifies the election results. Do they dare certify in favor of Hillary if vote count is not finished? Do they not certify anything, which means there are no electors from the states?
Perhaps the Hillary end game is to deny enough electoral votes, take it to the new House of Representatives, and make the case to the American people that she had two million more votes and Trump did not get the electors necessary.
This is more than to just delegitimize his victory. It is to try to steal it.
Bet the Trump people know, but keep their cards close to the vest so to speak, before speaking or taking action. I hope that is what is going on.
Michigan Secretary of State is a Republican.
Not only is Michigan’s SoS a Republican, she was the running mate of Dick DeVos, husband of Trump’s Secretary of Education choice, when DeVos ran for governor.
“...by demanding a recount approach that cannot get done in time for December 13th...”
Communist scu&bags are always hiding behind something as they attempt their subversions.
In this case, they’re hiding behind “the integrity of the vote” to change the result of a legitimate election.
There’s no end to their perfidy and scuminess.
IMHO
Wouldn’t this recount be to benefit Hillary, not Stein herself?
It wins for one side.
Just their attempt to do this proves that Trump was correct when he declared that the elections and the process is a rigged system.
Mr. Trump, the Clintons are NOT “good people”, like you recently said.
Obama is NOT a “good man,” like you said when you left your meeting with him at the White House the day after the election.
FOX Radio News said at noon Eastern time that Hitlery tweeted out the news that she is on board with the recount, that we owe it to our voters, we have to make sure that no foreign entity hacked into the machines, etc.
So, here we go!
I wish Trump would demand a recount in New Hampshire, Virginia, Minnesota, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, etc.
And how about determining how many illegals voted across the country, especially in Cali-frickin’-fornia?
So much for Donald Trump not accepting the results of the election.
-PJ
Hillary’s only hope is to flip all three states. If it goes to the House [Senate for VP],GOP wins.
So much for Trump not going ahead with the investigations because she has suffered enough. A scorpion can't help being what it is.
What is a little perjury to Democrats?
It would be no problem at all to generate 200,000 different names - all with legitimate addresses and a selection of different legitimate credit cards.
Feed the input file into a botnet script at a controlled rate and transfer whatever funds the sponsors wish to spend.
The certifying authority would never need to know, and it would not be obvious unless you started checking the credit cards. They would not check them. But if anyone ever did, the campaign authorities would have plausible deniability.
And if they succeeded in overturning the election, there would never be any follow-up.
...never know until it is spilled on Wikileaks.
So the choice is a) a botnet donating from multiple accounts and randomly generating donor information that would fool the FEC and not get anyone arrested or b) a script that ticks up the donation number a randomly generated number between two numbers each 1-3 minutes.
Which do you consider most likely?
Arrest Warrant out for Jill Stein: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498773/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.