It was established by the Communications Act of 1934. It along with NTIA (who regulates government entities) were mainly purposed to de-conflict the frequency spectrum in the RF world and to regulate cable, telephony, telegraph, etc.
I think that there are valid reasons to do these things, chiefly out of a sense of order and planning and logical expansion and improvement. However, it should not be the FCC’s business to regulate content, equal time or a host of other things it now does. It most certainly needs a comprehensive overhaul IMO to get the politics out and common sense and planning back in.
>
there are valid reasons to do these things, chiefly out of a sense of order and planning and logical expansion and improvement.
>
1st, and ALWAYS #1: “By what authority?...”. 2nd, yes, and the free market handles such things quite well enough.
>
However, it should not be the FCCs business to regulate content, equal time or a host of other things it now does. It most certainly needs a comprehensive overhaul IMO to get the politics out and common sense and planning back in.
>
See #1 above. Equal time\etc., that is up to the provider (whom wished to $$$). As per content, that is handled best by the consumer (got a good enough ‘ratings’ method to use the on\off\channel buttons as required).
The ONE area where I believe there needs govt to utilize its authority (roll-back that which it allowed): the monopoly of news\TV\cable\media\etc. by a few corporations.
>
...equal time ?
I thought the fairness doctrine was dead in the water ?
Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners
Abolish the FCC and investigate these bureaucratic tyrants