Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weird Science: Can a mad experiment bring Hillary’s campaign back to life?
Wall St Journal:Best of the Web ^ | 11/23/16 | James Taranto

Posted on 11/23/2016 12:33:18 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump...Those states are Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, whose combined 46 electoral votes are enough to swing the result...

the scientists, led by University of Michigan computer scientist J. Alex Halderman, “so far have only a circumstantial case”

in all three states the deadline for requesting a recount is within the next week...

the theory here is that Russia hacked into the three states’ vote-counting systems and produced just enough votes for Trump (or destroyed enough for Mrs. Clinton) to give him the edge...we are supposed to believe that the Russians understood the politics of the Great Lakes region better than the operators of the vaunted Clinton machine did. ... preposterous on its face.

FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver: "Some *very* quick analysis which suggests the claim here of rigged results... is probably BS"...

the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: bogus; clinton; recount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: Behind Liberal Lines

Dead is dead. Final.


61 posted on 11/23/2016 2:05:11 PM PST by I want the USA back (Lying Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

I suppose those “geeks” want to write the programs that do the counting as well. They will not and do not get it, SHE LOST!


62 posted on 11/23/2016 2:11:24 PM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Interesting link. Thanks.


63 posted on 11/23/2016 2:36:22 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
...the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked.

If they'd listened to Salena Zito of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review rather than their pollsters, they'd have known what was about to happen.

64 posted on 11/23/2016 2:50:30 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leaning conservative

Conceding has no legal binding.

Just more trying to delegitimize his win. I will happily welcome any honest statewide investigation into voter fraud any day in PA. Guarantee it will find at least 100k worth of votes for the D that are illegal minimal.


65 posted on 11/23/2016 2:51:21 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

On the day that clinton is convicted on crimes against the United States, let all those who voted for the felon in the election step forward to be recounted.


66 posted on 11/23/2016 3:18:37 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

prominent computer scientists and election lawyers HAHAHAHA


67 posted on 11/23/2016 3:28:23 PM PST by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (VMFA 235 '69-'72 KMCAS <---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

I don’t know how the votes are tallied in the three states mentioned in the article, but in Georgia the voting machines are not networked. Each precinct counts its votes separately and then reports them to the county election board which, in turn, reports them to the secretary of state.


68 posted on 11/23/2016 3:33:04 PM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Is the proposed recount going to exclude Detroit and other cities with Democrat governments? An honest recount in the cities must produce a whole lot more Trump votes and a whole lot fewer Clinton votes. How are they going to honestly recount the votes that registered as “Clinton” when “Trump” was marked?


69 posted on 11/23/2016 4:25:49 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

“There are sporadic reports of people who registered to vote in the 1960s and still do - meaning lots of 100+ year old voters.”

How does that compute? I was eligible to vote at age 21 in 1965 and I have 28 years left before I hit 100.


70 posted on 11/23/2016 4:50:25 PM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: No_More_Harkin

“Any chance we could egg them on to do it??”

Yes, we can fabricate a story that a warehouse in Chicago filled with Hillary ballots burned to the ground, proving that Hillary won the election.


71 posted on 11/23/2016 4:54:34 PM PST by sergeantdave (Trump will give us 80% of what we want, while hillary will take 100% of what we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I find this somewhat reassuring. Usually the insane "experts" are not so blatantly obvious.
But the deliberate obfuscation is always there.

Weasel phrases and words like "group," but only a single name is provided; 50 can be a group as well as 4. "prominent" is always in the eyes of the of the beholder and usually meaningless to everyone else.

Pure propaganda. A tiny insignificant group, spouting nonsense, and counting on the fact that 75% of the readers are both ignorant and, well, dull and; no other way to phrase it, stupid.

72 posted on 11/23/2016 6:56:47 PM PST by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
‘Pubbies can’t do anything about fraud (consent decree) but they can participate if the Democrats go to court!

Time to repudiate that absurd "consent decree," or to make it applicable to ALL parties.

If not now that the Hillarite crimes have been documented, when?

73 posted on 11/23/2016 7:03:36 PM PST by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
There are sporadic reports of people who registered to vote in the 1960s and still do - meaning lots of 100+ year old voters.

Obamamath?
I voted the same year that I qualified to do so.

I am not 110+ years old.

I have voted in every election since then.

74 posted on 11/23/2016 7:19:09 PM PST by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson