Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sounds like a plan to me. Get us out of Agenda 21 as well and get rid of the world heritage site designation on US soil while at it.
1 posted on 11/21/2016 6:51:20 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

The ‘way out’ is the “advise and consent” clause in the Constitution.


2 posted on 11/21/2016 6:53:48 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

While we are at it, let’s pull out of the UN altogether.


3 posted on 11/21/2016 6:55:31 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This reform will not last as long as the basic premise of man-made global warming continues to be accepted by low information voters. The first step in challenging this is to end the terrorization of the skeptics.


4 posted on 11/21/2016 6:58:10 AM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

It was never ratified

We don’t need a ‘way out’, it is not law.

A president cannot make ‘agreements’ unilaterally, only Treaties - which Congress must ratify.


5 posted on 11/21/2016 7:00:26 AM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The president-elect has expressed skepticism about the Paris Agreement, and for good reason. American households and businesses will incur [1] higher energy costs and a weaker economy while seeing meaningful change in global temperatures.

What the H does meaningful change in global temperatures actually mean? Did someone’s pen slip? How in H does someone think we are going to see meaningful change in global temperatures? Is someone in direct contact with God?


6 posted on 11/21/2016 7:00:36 AM PST by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and. the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Delay is not dead. Must get out of it & move UN to another country.


7 posted on 11/21/2016 7:01:02 AM PST by Lopeover (The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The way out would be to tell them to kiss our ass. Being ruled by a Frenchman. I never thought that the United States of America could sink that low. But the voters in 2008 and 2012 made a believer out of me.


9 posted on 11/21/2016 7:04:32 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

“climate negotiators”, term from the article.

Just another term for UN plunderers. Kick the UN out of the USA. They might have been formed for an altruistic purpose in 1945, because there should be an international forum for nations to communicate through. At this point the UN has devolved into a giant fiasco.


10 posted on 11/21/2016 7:04:48 AM PST by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Garbage.

Was this “agreement” submitted to the Senate for ratification? No?

Then it is meaningless. Ignore it.


11 posted on 11/21/2016 7:08:54 AM PST by Jim Noble (The pump don't work 'cause the vandals took the handles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I don’t understand why anyone would consider this “agreement” to be binding.


13 posted on 11/21/2016 7:12:06 AM PST by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

All well and good but all Trump needs to do is send a letter stating that the Paris Agreement was never ratified by the Senate and is therefore not binding upon the United States.


14 posted on 11/21/2016 7:15:48 AM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The Senate never ratified it, therefore it was never in force to begin with.


23 posted on 11/21/2016 8:04:23 AM PST by MortMan (A just nation applies it laws faithfully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Or bypass all the hoopla and ignore the entire circus. No attendance. No $$$$$. No acknowledgement of it whatsoever.


24 posted on 11/21/2016 8:06:02 AM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
"Withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In 1992, United Nations member states attended the Conference on Environment and Development. More commonly known as the Rio Earth Summit, the meeting led to the signing of the framework convention."

What is journalism coming to? There's entirely too much verbiage in this. The author must be getting paid by the word. That can be made so much shorter ...

"Withdraw from the United Nations."

There ... see? Simple and elegantly to the point ...

25 posted on 11/21/2016 8:10:57 AM PST by BlueLancer ("If the present tries to sit in judgment on the past, it will lose the future." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Absolutely agree!


26 posted on 11/21/2016 10:42:09 AM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson