Posted on 11/21/2016 6:14:30 AM PST by detective
The handbook you linked to has to do with Internet versions of radio stations, a different animal than Twitter. There might be regulations about how campaign ads originating from the campaigns have to have a disclaimer. That eeven applies to signs. It has nothing to do with whether the Daily Mail, Pravda, Al-Jazeera or Drudge can refuse an ad from a campaign.
Like I said, possible violations. It could be that internet banner ads are new enough that the FEC is still getting their arms around such. But IMO the same rules regarding access that apply to TV and radio should apply to Google, Twitter and other sites that generate banner advertising.
I think this is the most realistic course of action.
Hopefully it happens.
Can the business model last?
General Michael Flynn said that individuals on Twitter were a huge influence in favor of Trump. So Trump save several million dollars and Twitter is now labeled as dirty. FEC has never censured any Democrat. Dirtier than dirt.
If they offered those same services to Hillary they are in violation of Federal election law.
Twitter stock price in Jan 2014 was $69.00
Now $18.80 as of today.
https://www.google.com/#q=twitter+stock
That is a YUGE drop. You would think the board would fire everyone.
In Liberalandia, failure is a resume enhancement!................
They will.. after it's far too late.
#29/30 They will hire Marissa Mayer from Yahoo to run Twitter. She will get another contract worth north of $55 million.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.