Posted on 11/11/2016 4:45:56 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
I guess this is how he will devolve the EPA.
States get the money....
EPA split into state offices.
Never heard him say that...that sounds great!
Seriously hope this turns out to be true. As a non-climate technology scientist, this uber-politicized junk science BS is one of my major pet peeve issues with the globalists, and in general.
Ebell grew up on a 2,000 acres (810 ha) cattle ranch in Oregon. He graduated from Colorado College with a B.A. in philosophy and obtained an M.Sc. in political theory from the London School of Economics. He did graduate work in history at the University of California at San Diego and at Peterhouse College, University of Cambridge, and while in England met a girl from Albuquerque who became his wife. He had no formal scientific education, and makes no claim to be a scientist. When asked about scientific topics in interviews, he says he is "not a climate scientist. I'm just giving you the informed layman's perspective". His view is that "If science is going to be discussed in the public arena, then shouldn't people other than scientists be allowed to participate? Isn't that what a representative democracy is?
Some logic and honesty in gubm’nt?!!!
This is great news!
Just kidding. More winning is more better
Ed
Who is going to clean up the hazardous and toxic waste problem from all the lib heads exploding?
“publisher calls entirely at odds with scientific consensus”.
This from Scientific American (sigh), a publication I used to respect.
To bad they decided to go completely PC VOODO BULLSH!T NOT SCIENCE back in 1972.
Just as a matter of interest folks, the key word there was “CONSENSUS”.
Politics is a matter of consensus and agreement, NOT SCIENCE.
SCIENCE IS BASED ON REPEATABLE EXPERIMENTATION AND PROOF, NOT CONSENSUS!!!!!!!!!!
Patrick Moore was the guy I had in mind, but Bjorn Lomberg is another impressive thinker (good writer as well.) I read his “Skeptical Environmentalist” a couple of years ago and it blew me away. I hope he’ll be in touch with Team Trump!
AMEN, BROTHER!
Myron is as good a choice as could be imagined. Chuck Cushman sent me to him, and I found him to deeply knowledgeable, conservative in the sense of an “originalist”, and both erudite and yet easily understandable. As an example, he used the term ‘kleptocrat’ to describe AgencyPersons abusing both law and regulation.
I look forward to reading his decisions regarding EPA.
Myron is as good a choice as could be imagined. Chuck Cushman sent me to him, and I found him to deeply knowledgeable, conservative in the sense of an “originalist”, and both erudite and yet easily understandable. As an example, he used the term ‘kleptocrat’ to describe AgencyPersons abusing both law and regulation.
I look forward to reading his decisions regarding EPA.
Well stated, FRiend.
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.
-Galileo Galilei
Not to say Ebell is that guy, but this emphasis - nay elevation of "consensus" to the position of Determiner of Scientific Truth, is antithetical to everything I learned as a hero-worshipping scienceling.
Nope, no Nobel Prize for Mrs. Don-o.
She’s not being green enough.
To be truly green she has to capture that methane gas with a rubber bladder and use it to cook or heat her house with.
Not yet! Go Trump! Can’t wait to see what’s next. Convince Mitch to get rid of filibuster rule maybe
I want a Winning T-shirt of “Winning” raised to the power of infinity.
Oh damn, this is just too good. When have we won like this!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.