I agree that the headline overstates it, but it does bring up an important question. Why the remark about crack when talking about the NAACP?
I simply think it’s only fair that we be allowed to ask.
Sorry, I thought it was obvious in my post #2.
The author (Corey Ciorciari) is asking if they should "hit the crack-cocaine" ISSUE again.
Meaning: should they bring it up in a speech at an upcoming NAACP dinner, and advocate a change in the law to "level out" the penalties for crack and cocaine?
There is plenty of damning information in the Podesta emails. Bringing up something that can be so obviously discredited simply undermines the impact of the truly bad stuff. Instead, you'll make the discussion about how "those stupid people can't even read".
Even though the left does the same thing, you can't expect fair treatment. Stop playing into their trap, and stick to what's real.