Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Why the remark about crack when talking about the NAACP?

Sorry, I thought it was obvious in my post #2.

The author (Corey Ciorciari) is asking if they should "hit the crack-cocaine" ISSUE again.

Meaning: should they bring it up in a speech at an upcoming NAACP dinner, and advocate a change in the law to "level out" the penalties for crack and cocaine?

There is plenty of damning information in the Podesta emails. Bringing up something that can be so obviously discredited simply undermines the impact of the truly bad stuff. Instead, you'll make the discussion about how "those stupid people can't even read".

Even though the left does the same thing, you can't expect fair treatment. Stop playing into their trap, and stick to what's real.

16 posted on 11/06/2016 12:01:14 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking

Not obvious to me. I sense absolute scorn in that post.


17 posted on 11/06/2016 12:04:13 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hillary's Trickle Up policy: take bribes, sell sleazy pardons, water down AIDS medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: justlurking

What I mean is that Team Clinton demonstrated contempt for the NAACP — a very scornful view. And many others would want that cleared up as well.


20 posted on 11/06/2016 12:05:21 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hillary's Trickle Up policy: take bribes, sell sleazy pardons, water down AIDS medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson