Posted on 11/05/2016 2:13:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Give him his due. At the very least, Filipino President Rodrigo Duterte is never dull.
Beyond calling Barack Obama names that would naturally lead in another setting to a brawl behind the schoolyard, the canny if vulgar Duterte is surprisingly effective at doing what smaller powers are supposed to do in a multipolar setting: playing larger powers off one another.
With the Philippines long seen as being comfortably in the pocket of Washington, the countrys new leader has initiated a policy of strategic drift away from the US, moving to a more equidistant position between America and China.
Duterte being Duterte, he has done so with the subtlety of a mallet. Proclaiming (in Beijing no less) that America has lost its rivalry in East Asia with China, the Filipino President offered to immediately leave Beijing and jet off to Moscow to confer with anti-American champion, Vladimir Putin, and to definitively ally the Philippines within a China-Russia-Iranian axis. As he memorably put it, America has lost now. Ive realigned myself in your [Chinas] ideological flow. Was it my imagination or did the smiles at the usual diplomatic banquet in Beijing seem unusually broad that night?
But Dutertes buffoonish facade masks a cunning Machiavellian thinker; while his strategic hedging is real, he has not moved (and does not want to move) from Americas pocket into Chinas. The whole goal of the exercise is to re-assert the Philippines strategic independence and the material benefits that flow from it.
Proving he is crazy like a fox, Dutertes rewards were not long in coming. During his diplomatic visit to Beijing, Chinese President Xi Jinping offered the loud-mouthed Philippine leader $9bn in loan credits, also agreeing to $13.5bn in trade deals, as a reward for Dutertes shift and for agreeing to renew bilateral talks (effectively setting aside a pro-Manila Hague tribunal ruling) resolving boundary disputes in the South China Sea. Given that Manila is desperately in need of such funds (particularly regarding infrastructure investment) to keep its booming economy going, Dutertes sea change makes eminent realist strategic sense.
But there is a deeper problem lurking beneath the atmospherics here, one that does actually endanger Americas heretofore dominant strategic position in the region; a real questioning by Asian allies of Washingtons strategic dependability. Even before his shocking trip, Duterte wondered aloud whether a feckless and self-involved America would honour its 1951 Mutual Defence Treaty with the Philippines, and come to the countrys assistance in the event of an attack by China.
Obamas feckless announcement of a red line in Syria (and then his correct decision not to enter that hellhole) has surely damaged US credibility around the world. If Americas strategic word is not to be trusted, then Dutertes strategy of strategic hedging between the US and China becomes the only sensible policy for the region as a whole to adopt.
But far worse looms ahead, a true geostrategic disaster in the making. The Obama White House has rightly called completion of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal the lynchpin of Americas Pivot to Asia, as it binds America and its allies economically to each other in the new era just as it sets regional trade rules which China must ultimately accept or be excluded (as it now is) from such a desirable club.
Americas failure to follow through on such a beneficial agreement will have doleful geostrategic consequences. And here the US is sleepwalking toward disaster. Hillary Clinton, the likely new President, has already cynically disavowed an agreement she helped negotiate, trying to fend off the clear protectionist bent of a majority of her party. Given Donald Trumps characteristically shrill and mindless denunciation of the pact, its only hope is passage in the lame duck session of Congress, between November 2016 and January 2017. For the horrifying news is that, after that, large free trade pacts of any kind will be dead on arrival.
Imagine the US having to go back to its East Asian allies after all the laborious TPP negotiations, telling them America was just kidding about the whole thing. The very next day, China will whisper in Americas nervous Asian friends ears that obviously Washington can no longer be trusted. Here poisonous American domestic politics will have directly contributed to increased global risk, with Duterte amounting to just a very shrewd canary in the coal mine. For the real risk to Americas Pivot to Asia isnt Duterte, or even China. It lies in the mirror.
Dr John C Hulsman is senior columnist at City AM, a life member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and president of John C. Hulsman Enterprises. He can be reached for corporate speaking and private briefings at chartwellspeakers.com
Well, we don't want a brawl with the Philippines anyway, but...Barack Obama is the biggest pussy ever elected to high office in this country. I'll be happy if we don't get our ass kicked while he is still in charge.
Hmmm. I’m not sure a pivot towards China is in the cards, when China was prepared to attack them in September.
0bama’s pivot to Asia is a disaster as expected.
We are about to have as dynamic and sweeping a change of international policy as has taken place in our nation’s history.
The Pacific will be a lot better off as soon as Trump is elected, and by the end of his terms, things will be very sound.
A life member of CFR writes a pro-TPP article?
I’m shocked I tell ya!
let them and their minions fight the battle....
lets not waste our young people on them....this govt is not worth a single life....
Asia is not a tinder box. Many of our former nominal allies will quietly realign with China. That doesn’t mean they will fight with each other, afterwards. China will “peacefully” get its way...that’s all.
I assumed wrongly.
it's intent, which became clear near the end was to lie about Trump.
.....meanwhile, knucklehead.....
Hey, just like his “jobs creation”!!!
Quickly going nowhere at all!!!
I hope you’re right.
The problem is China, and its own stability, and what its troubles may lead to.
The globalists want war.
The globalists want war.
The globalists are not building an island in the South China Sea. The Chicoms are. With our money.
I agree. I do have some fondness for the Philippines and their citizens, having lived there a few years, but...we can’t help the situation, having withdrawn from it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.