Posted on 11/05/2016 1:21:16 AM PDT by beejaa
In a most recent and revealing interview, Julian Assange met with his favorite documentarian, John Pilger. Assange offers several predictions and analyses, most quite revealing.
Via RT:
“RT (Russia Today) provides an alternative perspective on major global events, and acquaints international audience with a Russian viewpoint.”
Keeping the source in mind in such matters is important. Realizing that mono source information demands a certain level of skepticism, we shouldn’t simply file it for immediate dismissal.
The two most glaring points raised by Assange are as follows:
Trump will “not be permitted to win.” In answer to the question, “Is Wikileaks trying to put Trump in the White House?” Assange insists that Trump will not be permitted to win. “Banks, intelligence, arms companies, big foreign money, etc. is all united behind Hillary Clinton….and the media as well…the owners and the journalists themselves.”
The Clinton Foundation has received significant contributions from some of the same countries that are funding ISIS. Hillary Clinton was aware of the Saudi funding of ISIS and also accepted money for her foundation from the Saudis...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Of course my rules were different. She could not get her learner’s permit until she could shoot, field strip, clean, and reassemble a 1911 and she could not get her driver license until she could change a tire by herself.
It is getting in front of people. Look at the hit counts. Even if the BSM won’t cover it, in fact ESPECIALLY if they refuse to cover it. Everyone knows they are biased.
The Saudi have obviously been pushing more buttons behind the scenes than we realize and for a very long time. An asteroid from Hell blasted into millions of pieces might not be a bad idea.
After all how many religious artifacts has ISIS destroyed? You can coun’t ‘em.
And guess which side has been preparing for years? The evil ones will pass out bullets and guns but they will not see what hit them.
Grim wrote:
“Assange is wrong. What he said was Trump’s problem is that he has no block of the establishment to back him. This was a few days before it became clear that the FBI is “Trumpland” and the NYPD, thanks to Mayor Giuliani, will also back him. Also, there’s the shadowy group of former intelligence community players who know the danger of letting Hillary into the WH. So Trump does have backing from some very powerful institutions and it may be enough.”
^^ THIS
What you posted should be posted on any and all threads that change assange’s quote.
Context is —EVERYTHING— and the media twist and leave stuff out —constantly—
“Banks, intelligence, arms companies, big foreign money, etc. is all united behind Hillary Clinton…”
Ditto for Jeb Bush. Didn’t work out too well for Jeb and his NWO backers.
“Trump won’t be Allowed,,?!? Assanges words , or “Theirs?”
I would say that it’s up to GOD ALMIGHTY, the GOD of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, will determine who the winner of Tuesday’s Presidential election will be.
LOL. My mom earned a chemistry degree back in 1941! SHe said that while girls were playing with dolls she was playing with erector sets. She worked for the Manhattan project then Pfizer. She was hired in with 30 other men and was relegated to a secretary. She quit soon after, got married and had many kids. She later got a masters and taught middle school. After retiring and later dad passed away, she made a mint in the stock market circa 2004 through 2010 by carefully studying companies and reading IBD every day. So keep on keeping on.
Assange was actually answering the question as to why he seems to be against Hillary and for Trump. His answer was that Trump will not be allowed to win (if he didn’t publish).
Don’t know why this soundbite go so twisted but it’s everywhere like this, that he just made this prediction.
Unfortunately, I don’t see anything happening with that story. I happened to be listening to the Breitbart show on the radio when they brought Erik Prince on, and he is the one who brought it up. I was kind of shocked they let him run with it. I don’t think BB is confident enough to say it themselves, but allowing a guest to speak about it (and callers) is a way for them to push the story to see if it gets any traction. If the story is true I can’t believe those who know about it would not go public by Monday if the FBI doesn’t take action by then.
And the people at the top aren't going to simply hand it over to the rabble without a fight.
Here's one thing you can be absolutely certain of no matter what the finally tally: Hillary will not concede.
If Election Day does not go her way, we can expect Wednesday morning the DNC will roll out an army of lawyers, the best money can buy, to manufacture every election irregularity they can think of. She'll have friendly judges, the media, world leaders and Hollywood all rallying behind her.
It's going to be protracted, ugly, and quite possibly violent.
No disrespect intended to the people of our military, but I would suggest that without the huge technological gap we enjoy, we would have gotten our asses kicked in any of these silly Middle Eastern conflicts.
The title that American thinker takes from the video absolutely misses the point. Julian is saying that were it not for his actions Trump would not be allowed to win. Never does he say that Trump will not win.
> CW2 is more than likely if they 86 Trump, it’s a absolute lock.
And guess which side has been preparing for years? The evil ones will pass out bullets and guns but they will not see what hit them.
________________________________________________________
I believe the US population IN GENERAL is way too soft, pampered and dependent to ever rise up en masse against the government. It just won’t happen, because, no matter what the emotional sentiment, no one wants to be the first sacrifice.
UNLESS, individual states secede or strong leaders arise and survive long enough to rally the dissidents, and I see not such leaders on the horizon at the moment. But the people will not just rise up spontaneously. Conditions are not near right for that.
There are leaders. I’ll just leave it there.
I love your story. Good for you! God bless.
“I would suggest that without the huge technological gap we enjoy, we would have gotten our asses kicked in any of these silly Middle Eastern conflicts.”
For the infantry, there is no “huge technological gap”. Perhaps our body armor helped with small arms fire as well as partially negating IEDs and EFPs.
Every trooper on the ground endured PLENTY of hardship!
History has shown that it's damn near impossible a foreign invader on equal terms with its opponent to maintain a long-term ground offensive in hostile territory. In some cases, even technological superiority can't make up for the "home field advantage" that one side enjoys (see the American Revolution for a good example of this).
Me likey!
I received my BS-Chem in 1981 after suffering through 2 sessions of P-Chem, Quantum Chem, Quantum Phys and Diff-EQ in my senior year. I still have nightmares over the assignments!
Good on ya’ mate!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.