Posted on 11/04/2016 9:04:29 PM PDT by Red Steel
He knows a whole lot more than they think.
And who is going to manage the cameras?
Where are Gov Scott and Pam Bondi on this???
Bookmark
Open, brazen fraud that must be confronted and stopped. If Trump were to lose Florida by 20,000-30,000 votes, he should never concede.
“Why isn’t the Broward County Sheriff’s Department preparing to arrest Snipes and her whole staff? “
Why? Because this is just further evidence or the Just Us System and the Sheriff is part of the action.
Scott Israel is the most politicized sheriff in the history of Broward County.
Bump!!
“Election fraud should carry either 20-to-life or the death penalty. They’re stealing my vote, and I won’t have it! GD scumbags!”
Election fraud is basically treason. It should carry a penalty of a firing squad.
If Anon Larper is right, the old school fraud (shadow-voting, multiple-voting) starts getting hard to conceal right around 10%. That used to be the “too big to cheat” margin.
The electronic machines are problematic, because votes don’t need to be manufactured, they can just be straight-up stolen. If the info is correct, they will be set to cap Trump at around 44%. More than that and the Trump votes will be flipped to H to maintain the ratio. This can be circumvented with paper ballots, since that would take them out of the electronic tally and thus not count toward the Trump “hard cap” after which votes will flip.
In California there was a huge discrepancy in the D primary between paper count and electronic count. Since Bernie was never intended to win, he didn’t pursue it. We will have to, and the paper trail is essential.
If 2 out of 10 Trump voters will vote on paper, we can effectively “neutralize” the electronic fraud and get back to roughly even (H max 56%, DJT 44%, and DJT paper 11% or more). 3 out of 10 would all but guarantee a win. This assumes the actual numbers on the ground nationwide are 55-35 which seems a conservative estimation based on many criteria discussed elsewhere (all the polls have fraud baked in, they are garbage).
1) If you have electronic voting DO NOT USE IT. Request a paper ballot as is your right. Remember, 3 out of 10 votes withheld from the e-systems tally will make the landslide too big to cheat under the proposed e-fraud methodology.
2) Do not vote early no matter the device. Early voting gives the D’s targets for the level of old-school fraud ballots to be manufactured and shadow-voted. Deny them information, and time.
The level of fraud currently going on is too big to hide and it still won’t be enough. They will need to go full Venezuela. Make them push it to the max, take reckless risks, catch them in the crime.
But let’s face it, your analysis is extremely poor. The type of behavior you describe taking place in Walmart is found as much in white women as it is in black.
That will be my new tagline.
Let me see if this fixes that.
Has this all been sent to Trump
Is something going to happend to stop this?
That was a rumor started by Roger Stone who has since retracted it.
Meant to say happen
The punishment should fit the crime. No less than 5 years on a hard labor work farm for each fraudulent vote cast. Clearly these people would all be working for free for the rest of their miserable lives as it should be. Voter fraud is only slightly less bad than murder.
Gore tried in 2000 to have only certain counties’ votes recounted seeking advantage. Trump should request that if the country of Broward’s votes are too fraudulent to determine the true vote, that the whole county gets decertified. Zero votes in a heavy Demonrat district is the right penalty for this sort of thing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3489238/posts?page=43#43
It is hereby ordered that, effective immediately and extending until 11:59 p.m., November 8, 2016, or until voting in the 2016 Presidential Election is complete, Defendants Trump, Stone, and Stop the Steal—as well as their officers, agents, servants, and employees— and other individuals or groups, including groups associated with the Clinton for Presidency campaign, are restrained and enjoined from engaging in voter intimidation activity, including but not limited to:
a. Hindering or delaying a voter or prospective voter from reaching or leaving the polling place fixed for casting the voter’s ballot;
b. Engaging in any unauthorized “poll watching” activities inside of polling places, within one hundred feet of polling places (“the buffer zone”)11, or within ten feet of a voter standing in a line extending beyond the buffer zone.12 Unauthorized “poll watching” includes challenging or questioning voters or prospective voters about their eligibility to vote, or training, organizing, or directing others to do the same;
c. Interrogating, admonishing, interfering with, or verbally harassing voters or prospective voters inside polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone, or training, organizing, or directing others to do the same;
d. Distributing literature and/or stating to individuals at polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone, that voter fraud is a crime, or describing the penalties under any Ohio or Federal statute for impermissibly casting a ballot, or training, organizing, or directing individuals to do the same;
e. Gathering or loitering, or otherwise being present without the intention to vote, at polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone;
f. Following, taking photos of, or otherwise recording voters or prospective voters, those assisting voters or prospective voters, or their vehicles at or around a polling place, or training, organizing, or directing others to do the same;
g. Questioning, and training, organizing, or deputizing any persons to question voters at Ohio polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone, under the guise of the purported “exit polling” or “citizen journalist” operations organized and encouraged by Defendants Stone and Stop the Steal.
This Order does not apply to any activity explicitly authorized by Ohio law with respect to poll observers officially credentialed by a board of elections to be present at the polling place or the right under Ohio law for others to enter a polling place solely for purposes of reviewing the list of voters.13
It is further ordered that this Order be publicized to law enforcement and elections officials in advance of Election Day.
The Plaintiff will be required to post a $1,000 bond.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.