When there is nothing remaining to be scraped from the barrel’s bottom, it’s poke time. Shovel’s ready to dig deep.
Different maybe, but unparalleled?
Hellary’s would be unparalleled, illegal, and catastrophic.
For heaven’s sake. What about hillary accepting pilfered questions for at least one debate against Sanders precluding her from being Commander in Chief? Duty, HONOR, and country should mean something to a candidate for President.
The Wall Street Journal has been a propaganda organ of the Cheap Labor Express for years.
They are very worried that the Cheap Labor Express will be shut down.
Oh, but selling US influence as Sec. of State is just fine?
FUWSJ
ha ha ha
meanwhile,HiLIARy has been going around (with her supposed husband) collecting bribe money from dozens of ENEMY AGENTS and representatives of ENEMY dictatorships Moslems especially from the Gulf all the way to the (somewhat more benign) Moslem king of Moracco...
plus enemyNaziSoroz $$$$$$$$ flowing for HilLIARy through numerous front groups and fake groups
and the Clintons sold our out nuclear missile control technology (for multiple re-entry vehicles, so that five nuclear bombs can destroy 5 different American cities, all shot from a single rocket) to the Communist Chinese
and the Clintons have sold a major portion of our American nuclear fuels, uranium...to foreign interests, too
but of course, HilLIARy is not compromised AT ALL.
only Mr Trump is compromised because he owns a couple of hotels and a golf course
Except Trump says he will separate from his biz once elected.
Wow, I didn’t know that. Mr. Trump has been busy building a global real estate empire, and other business interests for decades.
Who would have thought that during that time he would have developed contacts and cultivated both business and personal relationships?
Hardly. He turns it over to his kids. They run the businesses, and he runs the country.
The difference being his doing business is legal, whereas the Clinton’s foreign fundraising , and receipt of foreign payoffs to their foundation and Global Initiative are illegal. If elected, Hillary and Bill will continue to line their pockets with money by using their position to conduct more illegal business.
Some of the Founding Fathers had interests which arguably could have involved conflicts of interest. But they were men of honor, and no one will suggest that they risked everything to win our sovereignty, to feather their own nests, as it were. Meanwhile, in the far less ethical America we live in today, we allow people who take unearned benefits from Government to vote for those who deliberately buy their votes with other people's money.
I am all for dealing with the really egregious conflicts of interest; but this article is a foolish diversion from what we should be working on: Electing Donald Trump!
What a pantload. This author ought to be working for Media Matters, not the WSJ
Yes, that was my first impression. This is really, really a stretch.
I seem to remeber George Washington being the wealthiest man in the country with extensive business interests. Maybe the WSJ should STFU.
One candidate used her government position, experience, and connections to become rich quickly with minimal effort. The other became rich through his own efforts and some startup money...and we’re worried about the latter why?
No one will take this article seriously. It’s just a fluffy fart.
Hey Alexandria, did you do an article on Hillary’s conflict of interest at the State department?
No?
Keep trying Alexandria, there are only a few days left to November 8.
Or November 9th if you are a Democrat.
5.56mm
BS ... he has dealt with most of those people .. and at top levels to do the kinds of deals he does. He already knows them and has DONE DEALS with them. This is not a detriment, it is EXPERIENCE and another reason to vote for Trump.