Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s Foreign Business Entanglements Would Create Unparalleled Conflicts
WSJ ^ | November 2, 2016 | Alexandria Berzon

Posted on 11/03/2016 11:04:59 AM PDT by prairiebreeze

Donald Trump’s adult children have spent a decade doing business with politically connected foreign firms—a role that will present potential conflicts of interest whether he wins on Nov. 8 or continues to pursue politics if he loses.

Those whom Ivanka Trump, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump have worked with abroad include: the family of a developer in India who is a ruling-party politician, an Azerbaijani government minister’s son and a media company that became the Turkish president’s outlet of choice during the July 15 coup attempt.

No recent president has had a portfolio of international business interests as extensive as Mr. Trump’s—or as great a level of business engagement on his behalf by offspring, who have also played a role in his campaign.

(snip)Mr. Trump’s campaign referred questions to Mr. Garten. The three Trump children didn’t respond to requests for comment sent through the campaign and the company.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Alberta's Child

That is actually sound advice.


41 posted on 11/03/2016 11:38:45 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

What a pantload. This author ought to be working for Media Matters, not the WSJ


42 posted on 11/03/2016 11:42:23 AM PDT by pissant ((Deport 'em all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Yes, that was my first impression. This is really, really a stretch.


43 posted on 11/03/2016 11:48:59 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Stay ignorant, my friends! (if you watch mainstream media, you will!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Hahahahaa...these guys are becoming pathetic....


44 posted on 11/03/2016 11:50:09 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

I seem to remeber George Washington being the wealthiest man in the country with extensive business interests. Maybe the WSJ should STFU.


45 posted on 11/03/2016 11:51:15 AM PDT by WMarshal (Trump 2016 - because the Demorats are criminals and the GOP is the Gang Of Pussies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

One candidate used her government position, experience, and connections to become rich quickly with minimal effort. The other became rich through his own efforts and some startup money...and we’re worried about the latter why?


46 posted on 11/03/2016 11:51:22 AM PDT by jimnm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

No one will take this article seriously. It’s just a fluffy fart.


47 posted on 11/03/2016 11:52:45 AM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Hey Alexandria, did you do an article on Hillary’s conflict of interest at the State department?

No?

Keep trying Alexandria, there are only a few days left to November 8.

Or November 9th if you are a Democrat.

5.56mm


48 posted on 11/03/2016 12:02:11 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

BS ... he has dealt with most of those people .. and at top levels to do the kinds of deals he does. He already knows them and has DONE DEALS with them. This is not a detriment, it is EXPERIENCE and another reason to vote for Trump.


49 posted on 11/03/2016 12:18:28 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

It would eliminate a lot of political problems down the road, for sure.


50 posted on 11/03/2016 12:35:03 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal
That kind of makes the author's point -- doesn't it?

Why do you think the nation's capital is located where Washington is right now? Who do you think owned all of the real estate the Federal government had to buy when it was established?

51 posted on 11/03/2016 12:36:22 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

One thing at a time:-)


52 posted on 11/03/2016 12:48:35 PM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

There were many owners of the land and the bulk of it was not Washington’s. Since you seem to be in the know on this, would you please detail how much land he sold and how much profit he made from the sale?


53 posted on 11/03/2016 12:58:43 PM PDT by WMarshal (Trump 2016 - because the Democrats are criminals and the GOP is the Gang Of Pussies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal
Read about Washington's push to get Alexandria included in the District of Columbia.

I'm not even suggesting that there was any wrongdoing here. What I'm pointing out is that even the appearance of an impropriety carries a lot of weight in these matters.

54 posted on 11/03/2016 1:07:29 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Oh, but “he has no foreign policy or diplomatic experience...”


55 posted on 11/03/2016 1:10:21 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (DEPLORABLES OF THE WORLD, UNITE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Compared to the $2.2 billion Hillary has taken in from foreign interests for promises of favors???

WSJ is full of poop!


56 posted on 11/03/2016 1:17:13 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Agree


57 posted on 11/03/2016 1:31:54 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

So true


58 posted on 11/03/2016 1:33:06 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
She meant he has no experience shaking down foreign governments for access.

Heh!

59 posted on 11/03/2016 1:34:33 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Plenty of hand-wringing and non-story here.


60 posted on 11/03/2016 1:35:27 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson