Posted on 11/03/2016 7:25:05 AM PDT by bobsunshine
BIG WIKILEAKS DEVELOPMENT— CLINTON CAMP CONSPIRED TO WITHHOLD EMAILS FROM STATE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATORS Jennifer Palmieri, the Director of Communications with the Hillary Clinton campaign, and top Clinton advisors conspired to withhold emails from FBI investigators.
Palmieri and top Clinton advisors committed conspiracy with campaign consultants to only turn over 55,000 emails to the State Department knowing there were more emails they were withholding.
This email was released by Wikileaks on Thursday November 3, 2016.
From the email:
Re: Emails development From:jbenenson@bsgco.com To: Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com Date: 2015-03-05 00:01 Subject: Re: Emails development
Definitely
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Margolis, Jim wrote:
> Yes.
> If there is a release of the 55K, are there others that are not being > released?
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
im not so sure look at times
also pertinent
...She claimed her private server had about 62k emails on it. She printed and released ~30k of them on 55k pages of paper and then deleted the other ~33k claiming they were personal emails, not work-related.....
Not for any information found, but for lying under oath.
I think it was Brett Bare (FOX) I heard it from.
I don’t agree. The time stamp shows that first Palmeri ask the question “assume you would agree this is the right move” (at 7:25 PM) - Answer “Yes” from Margolis at (at 8:01 PM). Then He asks the additional question “If there is a release of the 55K, are there others that are not being released?”
Then Beneson at midnight answers Margolis (no copy to Palmeri) with “Definitely”. If it was a response to the original question, then Beneson would have addressed it to Palmeri not Margolis.
So based on My analysis and the way one responds to emails, they WERE Going to hide more emails.
Spunky wrote: "...."that they would not be prosecuted for any information obtained from those laptops,......."Not for any information found, but for lying under oath. I think it was Brett Bare (FOX) I heard it from.
I saw that report too and under normal circumstances would readily agree that the issue is "lying under oath".
If only these were normal circumstances and we weren't dealing with an Attorney General willfully obstructing justice.
Good point. You could be right.
You need to reboot. Clinton is done. This is over.
I so hope but with the lack of integrity we’ve seen and how Teflon this woman has been thus far, I can’t indulge until she loses and is in cuffs...or a noose (they still hang treasonists, don’t they?).
The entire government has no integrity. And you can fret about what happens to H.Clinton after Trump wins the election. That’s the main thing here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.