Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtd
...."that they would not be prosecuted for any information obtained from those laptops,......."

Not for any information found, but for lying under oath.

I think it was Brett Bare (FOX) I heard it from.

103 posted on 11/03/2016 12:10:01 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky
Spunky wrote: "...."that they would not be prosecuted for any information obtained from those laptops,......."

Not for any information found, but for lying under oath. I think it was Brett Bare (FOX) I heard it from.

I saw that report too and under normal circumstances would readily agree that the issue is "lying under oath".

If only these were normal circumstances and we weren't dealing with an Attorney General willfully obstructing justice.

105 posted on 11/03/2016 12:44:28 PM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson