Not for any information found, but for lying under oath.
I think it was Brett Bare (FOX) I heard it from.
Spunky wrote: "...."that they would not be prosecuted for any information obtained from those laptops,......."Not for any information found, but for lying under oath. I think it was Brett Bare (FOX) I heard it from.
I saw that report too and under normal circumstances would readily agree that the issue is "lying under oath".
If only these were normal circumstances and we weren't dealing with an Attorney General willfully obstructing justice.