Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“Federal law not only prohibits misappropriating valuable confidential information, it also makes it a crime for anyone to knowingly receive such misappropriated information.” “A violation of the law carries a sentence of up to 10 years in Federal prison and a $5,000,000 fine,” Sukhia said.
1 posted on 11/02/2016 3:50:12 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: detective
This isn't Brazile's first dirty rodeo.

Twenty eight years ago back in October, 1988 she was forced out of the Dukakis campaign for her slimy democrat ethics.


27 posted on 11/02/2016 4:07:22 PM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

MAY have?!


32 posted on 11/02/2016 4:21:00 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

She did not steal anything, she was giving it freely by the corporation CNN.


33 posted on 11/02/2016 4:21:01 PM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
I'll go one step further and call it industrial espionage of CNN's intellectual property, that is, debate questions from a news organization in advance of the event. It damages the value of the questions and CNN's competitive advantage to have their IP taken before its intended public consumption.

Studies show that the biggest cybersecurity and IP threat comes from employees, not hackers, because employees feel an entitlement to the IP.

-PJ

34 posted on 11/02/2016 4:21:27 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Ya think?


39 posted on 11/02/2016 4:37:29 PM PDT by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Don’t you see? You’re committing a federal crime just by reading Wikileaks. Ask CNN. They’ll tell ya.


40 posted on 11/02/2016 4:37:34 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Why aren't I fifty pints ahead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Federal crime, huh? That means they’re eligible to have their asses thrown into Gitmo. Cool!


43 posted on 11/02/2016 4:59:37 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Clintoon will be the "historical" first unindicted felon to sit in the Oval Office. Be proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Unless CNN gave them to Brazile


44 posted on 11/02/2016 5:09:44 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

More than likely a CNN producer simply passed the questions to Donna Brazille and assumed that she’d pass them onto the Clinton campaign. CNN is clearly in the tank for Hillary.


48 posted on 11/02/2016 5:59:34 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

What about Federal rules pertaining to the media when broadcasting the election candidates, wgre they have to do certain things, like providing equal air time, and possibly other regulations. It affected the quality of the candidates during the time of the broadcasted event. I wonder if their is a section where if she acted as an agent of the media outlet and it happened to violate those rules, CNN gets a fine or an FCC license is in jeopardy?


49 posted on 11/02/2016 6:24:11 PM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

And she acts in such bad taste

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwOiJoOXgAAAZcM.jpg


51 posted on 11/02/2016 7:31:15 PM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I don’t give a rat’s behind about Donna Brazile. Why isn’t anyone asking Clinton why she was so willing to cheat?


52 posted on 11/02/2016 8:00:32 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

“...may have been a violation of federal law...”

Is there a Clinton operative anywhere who hasn’t broken a federal law?


53 posted on 11/03/2016 7:52:33 AM PDT by ops33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
As long as swamper Jeff Dopey Sessions is AG, we may as well ignore all stories of Clinton Cabal lawbreaking. He'll never lift a finger to go after them, and he will not retire, so that a real AG can take his place.
55 posted on 01/18/2018 2:07:11 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson