To: tomkat
They may be over-weighting Republicans in that sample.
4 posted on
11/02/2016 10:15:13 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: Alberta's Child
Last I saw in 2014 was D+7 in Michigan, so the sample is slightly optimistic for Trump, but not too far off.
15 posted on
11/02/2016 10:20:41 AM PDT by
CatOwner
To: Alberta's Child
“They may be over-weighting Republicans in that sample.”
I agree. Unfortunately, there are a lot of “yellow dog Dims” in Michigan. Remains to be seen whether they toe the union/Clinton line.
To: Alberta's Child
They may be over-weighting Republicans in that sample. No, they are not.
That was 2012
31 posted on
11/02/2016 10:30:02 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
To: Alberta's Child
Every poll we hear about "overweighting". Just like four years ago, when everyone thought the polls needed correcting.
The problem then, as it is now, is that many of these polls aren't "weighting" for party at all, so they can't be "overweighted". If you pick your random sample by criteria other than party, and 41% of the people answer the party ID question as "Democrat", that's not weighted, it's just reporting the results.
43 posted on
11/02/2016 10:37:32 AM PDT by
mlo
To: Alberta's Child
MI seems like a huge democrat state to be honest, I agree with you.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson