SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server

The Gateway Pundit ^ | 1 Nov 16 | Jim Hoft

[xzins]

SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server

Jim Hoft Nov 1st, 2016 11:10 am Leave a Comment

WIKILEAKS DISCOVERS THE SMOKING GUN–
The Clinton Campaign discussed destroying email evidence after story broke nationally that Hillary Clinton had an illegal homebrew server for her emails.

On March 2, 2015 The New York Times reported that Hillary Clinton used a personal email server as Secretary of State.

On March 2, 2015 Hillary Clinton’s top aide and attorney wrote John Podesta that “we are going to have to dump all those emails.”

They are finally busted.
Congratulations, Wikileaks. You did it.

Director Comey, here, I've done your job for you. Here is the intent. #podestaemails25 pic.twitter.com/2xYNqK4EHI

— MicroSpookyLeaks™ (@WDFx2EU7) November 1, 2016

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,

Gateway Pundit

---

[fhayek]

Exactly. Dump is what they planned, and dump was what they did.

[Red Steel]

I found the email in particular here. I thought I read someone above didn't believe this so I went to the source:

- - -- -

"On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 PM, John Podesta
wrote:

> On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have

> to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later

>> fysa

> On Mar 2, 2015 9:19 PM, "Cheryl Mills" wrote:

- end snip-

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841

[Mouton]

It looks like Mills wrote that to Podesta. Was not Mills one of the people given immunity by DOJ who could not then recall anything. Methinks this is a perjury count right here. Second, why has no one served a subpeona on Podestas emails??
They already know what they are going to find AND they have the probably cause to seize it.

[Twinkie]

No. DUMP means DUMP. “Publicly release” or RELEASE means
RELEASE. - If you take a DUMP, you FLUSH it down the old
toilet; never to be seen by anyone again; hopefully.

[Lent]

Pretty damning words. At minimum Podesta should be getting a visit by the FBI and he should be lawyered up. He should then resign. I see on his Twitter he has an allegation that DT has a secret email server set up to communicate privately with a Russian bank. Lol

[xzins]

This is simply the capstone to other actions and comments that also show intent.

[xzins]

And ‘those emails’ are the ones in question.

[FamiliarFace]

Thank you, that’s what I was looking for.

[tumblindice]

“To Podesta who wrote this it means destroy the emails.”

Precisely. Dump is a euphemism, or a word used to make something bad seem not so bad.
“Dump” doesn’t sound as bad as: “We’re going to have to *delete* these e-mails—even though there is an outstanding subpoena for them so that deleting them would be obstruction of justice, perjury and contempt, and that’s just for starters if we don’t dump them—and the sooner the better.”
(Enthymeme: Because if we don’t `dump’ them all our heads are in nooses.)

The quibbling I see here to square this circle for Hillary is absolutely Clintonesque.

[Let_It_Be_So]

suggestion, in writing, AFTER the private server was discovered: “We are going to have to dump all those emails”

subsequent action (already proven): 33,000 emails were deleted (or whatever the official number is)

Now the question is what will be done with this revelation?
The answer is: probably nothing.

[Stand Watch Listen]

Oh Say Can You Shill...90 second video

“An Ode to Queen Hillary”

BleachBit, hammers and public lies, oh my;
The stench of her YouTube Benghazi alibi.
Perverts and bimbos with Weiner & Slick Willy,
Hill’s character & judgement’s truly quite silly.
Syria, ISIS, and her Middle East ablaze,
Muslim Brotherhood still advises her ways.
A slush-fund foundation built on pay-to-play,
Dead broke to uber rich, the Clinton way.
Head trauma, “amnesia” and 13 devices, Hill’s cleaners excused with FBI passes.
Rule of law and blind justice bounced on it’s ass, Tricky Dick Nixon is surely aghast.
For America to remain the home of the brave,
We must not elect her or we dig our own grave.

[DungeonMaster]

This should be HUGE. But, the lapdog media, rather than report the NEWS—much less do any investigative reporting of their own—exist only to help her figure a way out of this, should it ever become a problem.

There are so many articles titled "smoking gun" or "this is the big one" it's hard to even get a reaction out of them.

[Twinkie]

The meaning of IS is IS.

[2nd Amendment]

After reading about all these dumps. . I have to do something!

[ColdOne]

2016 US elections
10m
Editor’s note: A recently-released hacked email from Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s account says “we are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later.” The email was written after the New York Times story that uncovered Clinton’s private email server use while secretary of state. While some reports on social media seem to suggest this meant the team wanted to delete the emails, the term “dump” is often used by politicians and the media when discussing a large release of documents. - Stephanie
End of note

__________________________

breakingnews.com

[Red Steel]

Mills started the email chain Podesta answered, and then Mills wrote back in the evening responding with:

"On Mar 2, 2015 9:19 PM, "Cheryl Mills" 'cheryl.mills@gmail.com' wrote:

>

>> fysa

'fysa'

[xzins]

The quibbling I see here to square this circle for Hillary is absolutely Clintonesque.

I think we are seeing evidence that the media talking heads are growing tired of having to square Clintonesque circles.

Doug Shoen, Michael Moore, Chris Matthews, Anderson Cooper, Matt Lauer...all of them aren't on our side, but I'm sensing they just don't want to do this "saving the Clintons" thing again.

I think they'd rather just clean the slate and plan to be the opposition to a Trump administration. And, honestly, won't that be far easier, won't it bring just as many viewers, and won't it get their own heads out of the Clinton noose?

Honestly, I think these people might be looking for greener pastures.

[Art in Idaho]

So, Mr. Comey, do we have Intent yet?

"1. 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information 18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information"

"2. U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material"

"3. 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) -- Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally"

Mr. Comey, did Hillary Clinton remove, conceal, mutilate, or destroy any document?

Assuming your answer is Yes, then is she Disqualified from holding any office under the United States?

"4. 18 U.S. Code § 641 - Public money, property or records"

"5. 18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees"

"6. 18 U.S. Code § 1519 -- Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations"

"7. 18 U.S. Code § 1031 -- Fraud against the United States 18 U.S. Code § 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio or television 18 U.S. Code § 1346 -- Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud" 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to defraud the United States"

"8. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit a federal offense

With each law broken multiple times, there are indictable offenses galore. According to Rudy Giuliani, there are at least 16 separate felonious violations of U.S. Federal Code, and many multiple counts therein.

Not a lawyer either but this whole intent thing reminds me of what I heard the other night, some guy stating, "It's the server stupid." Just setting up a private server conveys an intent to deceive, or as any 5th grader would say, "She was trying to hide something."

And how's this for intent?:

Did she intend to conceal emails/documents?

Did she intend to remove emails/documents?

Did she intend to mutilate and destroy emails/documents?

Did she intend to obliterate and falsify emails/documents?

Let's review a few other 18 U.S. Code violations:

"1. 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information 18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information"

"2. U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material"

"3. 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) -- Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally"

"4. 18 U.S. Code § 641 - Public money, property or records"

"5. 18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees"

"6. 18 U.S. Code § 1519 -- Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations"

"7. 18 U.S. Code § 1031 -- Fraud against the United States 18 U.S. Code § 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio or television 18 U.S. Code § 1346 -- Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud" 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to defraud the United States"

"8. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit a federal offens

With each law broken multiple times, there are indictable offenses galore. According to Rudy Giuliani, there are at least 16 separate felonious violations of U.S. Federal Code, and many multiple counts therein.

So, to review, Mr. Comey, did Hillary Clinton remove, conceal, mutilate, or destroy any email or document?

So, Mr. Comey, do we have Intent yet?

Mr. Comey, per 18 U.S. Code A 2071, is Hillary Clinton "Disqualified from holding any office under the United States?" A sincere question from a citizen who assumes we are a nation of laws.

American Patriots want to know, . . and soon.

[rolling_stone]

I checked it

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841

[Heart-Rest]

"Yoga emails, he meant yoga emails, everybody knows that ..."

---

Yes, and all the yoga photo email attachments too, like this one: