Skip to comments.
SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server
The Gateway Pundit ^
| 1 Nov 16
| Jim Hoft
Posted on 11/01/2016 9:46:20 AM PDT by xzins
SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server
Jim Hoft Nov 1st, 2016 11:10 am
WIKILEAKS DISCOVERS THE SMOKING GUN–
The Clinton Campaign discussed destroying email evidence after story broke nationally that Hillary Clinton had an illegal homebrew server for her emails.
On March 2, 2015 The New York Times reported that Hillary Clinton used a personal email server as Secretary of State.
On March 2, 2015 Hillary Clinton’s top aide and attorney wrote John Podesta that “we are going to have to dump all those emails.”
They are finally busted.
Congratulations, Wikileaks. You did it.
Filed Under: Uncategorized
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; comey; comeyrico; crookedhillary; destroyevidencerico; destruction; elections; emails; fbi; fbirico; hillary; lynchrico; obstruction; podesta; smokinggun; soshillary; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-215 next last
To: xzins
put him onm the lie detector and ask him what he meant by “dump”
181
posted on
11/01/2016 12:37:41 PM PDT
by
GotMojo
To: ichabod1; HangUpNow
Wikileaks promised Monday's dump would offer something new and big that would certainly send Hillary to jail. Many speculated that this would be the 30,000+ emails Hillary deleted. I'm surprised you both haven't read about it. Kim Dotcom has also made that suggestion.
Project Veritas also promised more bombshells. Bottom line is Hillary has to be disposed of the old fashioned way, or with a stake through her heart. If her deleted emails were going to come out they would have done so by now. The hype is just hype.
182
posted on
11/01/2016 12:38:51 PM PDT
by
Mase
(Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
To: xzins
183
posted on
11/01/2016 1:11:46 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: xzins
In addition to the disputable definition/intent of the word “dump,” a local radio host wonders if this Wikileaks info would even be admissable in a trial given it’s been supplied via illegal means/hacking (provided the actual email corroborating is not recoverable that is, in which case the hack would become a tip;). Any legal eagles here to weigh in on this?
To: JediJones
Obama can pardon the Clintons for criminal activity, but no Presidential pardon can keep her from being impeached while she is in office.
The only way to prevent the impeachment trial is to keep her from winning next week. The only way to keep the dirty laundry safely in the hamper is to prevent an impeachment trial.
To: Haiku Guy
A haiku:
Huma serves no more
She’s done licking that beaver
No more nude back rubs!
186
posted on
11/01/2016 1:17:38 PM PDT
by
T-Bone Texan
(Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
To: xzins
Wasn't it the "lack of intent to harm the country" that Comey used as his original excuse not to indite? How does the intent to destroy classified information equate to that? I know it would for any normal person, but this is the Clinton crime machine we're talking about.
187
posted on
11/01/2016 1:17:40 PM PDT
by
American Quilter
(Hillary is an Unindicted Criminal.)
To: T-Bone Texan
Silence falls at night
A deep sigh, a broken heart
An e-mail archive
To: xzins
That is clear conspiracy to obstruct justice. Nixon did nothing that egregious..
“Titled Destruction, Alteration or Falsification of Records in Federal Investigations and Bankruptcy, the provision was passed under Section 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The text of the statute is relatively straightforward:
“Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsified, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under Title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”18 usc 1519,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice
Of course Hillary actually did that with the 33,000 emails but here we see Mills and Podesta in the indictable conspiracy. Obama will grants Clemency to the entire rats nest as eraly as next Wednesday—
This is si blatant ,it is breath taking.
189
posted on
11/01/2016 1:36:03 PM PDT
by
WENDLE
(Did HUMA forward secret emails to foreign enemies?)
To: Haiku Guy
Prayers find spices.
Asses bite the pianos.
Papers splash armies.
To: Haiku Guy
Rats leaving the ship
Hillary’s future career:
Making license plates
191
posted on
11/01/2016 1:46:10 PM PDT
by
T-Bone Texan
(Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
To: xzins
This would get anyone else in US history indicted We're not talking about just H-> here! Just how is it H->'s elite status could rightfully extend to Mills, when it didn't extend to CIA Director Gen. Petraeus, one of far higher rank?
I think it's pretty clear that Mills' immunity should be deemed to have been breached by her lie of "not remembering" such an extremely important event is this "dumping."
(Similarly, I trust Abedin's immunity agreement should be deemed to have been breached.)
HF
192
posted on
11/01/2016 1:49:40 PM PDT
by
holden
To: T-Bone Texan
To: Behind the Blue Wall
So you think Podesta would say to release to the public all the classified data in the emails ... what a maroon!
194
posted on
11/01/2016 1:53:29 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for spiritual discernment)
To: T-Bone Texan
A64 31
Load another metal blank
A64 32
A64 33
America’s Dairyland
A64 34
A64 35
Keep you hand out of the press
A64 36
To: xzins
Evidence of “Mens Rea” “A Criminal Mind”
196
posted on
11/01/2016 2:30:03 PM PDT
by
Strac6
(Everything Depends On Defeating Hillary in November. Everything else is minor compared to that!)
To: xzins
It depends on the meaning of the word “dump.” LOL
197
posted on
11/01/2016 2:35:54 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Many of us knew Clinton was a rapist 24 years ago)
To: Helicondelta
Is that the Peter Kadzik who will be the DOJ person in charge of any decision to charge Huma Weiner, nee Huma Abedin, aka ..., et al. with crimes, crimes against humanity, etc.
and cbutts.obama? Ewww!
198
posted on
11/01/2016 3:01:52 PM PDT
by
bIlluminati
(Who is Horatio Bunce?)
To: Haiku Guy
Is it 65,000 Huma emails, or 650,000 Huma + A. Wiener emails? The NYPD and, now, FBI, knows, but I haven’t seen any confirmation. However, it is clear that hrc emails are part of the mix, whether forwards, from/to, cc, bcc, or all of the above.
My second best guess is that bill and hill had the same issue that A. Wiener had with the NYPD, and that NYPD will release by Friday if FBI maintains silence.
199
posted on
11/01/2016 3:08:13 PM PDT
by
bIlluminati
(Who is Horatio Bunce?)
To: doug from upland
That could be sheisse
Lol
200
posted on
11/01/2016 3:13:04 PM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-215 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson