Skip to comments.
SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server
The Gateway Pundit ^
| 1 Nov 16
| Jim Hoft
Posted on 11/01/2016 9:46:20 AM PDT by xzins
SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server
Jim Hoft Nov 1st, 2016 11:10 am
WIKILEAKS DISCOVERS THE SMOKING GUN–
The Clinton Campaign discussed destroying email evidence after story broke nationally that Hillary Clinton had an illegal homebrew server for her emails.
On March 2, 2015 The New York Times reported that Hillary Clinton used a personal email server as Secretary of State.
On March 2, 2015 Hillary Clinton’s top aide and attorney wrote John Podesta that “we are going to have to dump all those emails.”
They are finally busted.
Congratulations, Wikileaks. You did it.
Filed Under: Uncategorized
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; comey; comeyrico; crookedhillary; destroyevidencerico; destruction; elections; emails; fbi; fbirico; hillary; lynchrico; obstruction; podesta; smokinggun; soshillary; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-215 next last
To: UKrepublican
No. They have evidence what was meant, because they know what followed.
We’re only talking about ‘intent’.
If you KNOW that what happened was illegal, then a search for intent involves all of the circumstances, and THIS email as an addition to those circumstances, and WITH those circumstances, can only be interpreted as intent.
And with classified data, intent isn’t even necessary.
21
posted on
11/01/2016 9:53:51 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: xzins
"By 'dump' I meant preserve them and give them to the State Department and Congress!"
To: Helicondelta
This is what our Republic has sunk to?
To: xzins
Yup.
FBI agent 1 - “What did he mean by ‘dump’”?
FBI agent 2 - “Well, what did they do with them?”
FBI agent 1 - “They deleted them.”
FBI agent 2 - “Then ‘dump’ = ‘delete’. That is what he meant.”
24
posted on
11/01/2016 9:54:59 AM PDT
by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: Mr. Douglas
25
posted on
11/01/2016 9:55:14 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: Scythian_Reborn
“Yoga emails, he meant yoga emails, everybody knows that ...”
And recipes, secret recipes for cookies and other goodies..
To: Meet the New Boss
By dump, I meant sheisse all over them and THEN give them to Congress, the FBI, and the American People.
27
posted on
11/01/2016 9:56:04 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: xzins
CAN YOU SEE ‘INTENT’ NOW COMEY?
28
posted on
11/01/2016 9:56:04 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Trump is running against EVERYONE. The Democrats, The Media, and the establishment GOP)
To: InterceptPoint
It means throw away or trash them here.
A “dump” in computer lingo is the computer crashed, glitched, or system error that the data in memory gets put into dump file(s). No doubt Podesta did not meant this... still trash file.
To: JudyinCanada
This is good, but I dont understand how the actual bleaching of emails, hammering phones, etc. isnt a bigger smoking gun.
This proves intent.
It completely clarifies the meaning, purpose and intent of all those activities.
30
posted on
11/01/2016 9:56:57 AM PDT
by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: Mr. K
He can’t see INTENT in bleachbit, but maybe this will help.
31
posted on
11/01/2016 9:57:03 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: xzins
Boom. Or at least it should be a ‘Boom’ if normal people were involved.
32
posted on
11/01/2016 9:57:39 AM PDT
by
alancarp
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
[Honestly, Hillary deserves to be in prison, but dump could just as easily be interpreted as publicly release as opposed to delete. Not sure this is the smoking gun.]
Then why didn’t they release them instead of dumping them and using bleach bit to make site they were not recoverable?
33
posted on
11/01/2016 9:57:43 AM PDT
by
KansasGirl
(Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." Thomas Paine)
To: Leep
Who knows the Bushes aren’t neck deep themselves. Isn’t WJC an adopted son?
The go along and the get along.
34
posted on
11/01/2016 9:58:43 AM PDT
by
RinaseaofDs
(Truth, in a time of universal deceit, is courage)
To: alancarp
If it were either of us, we’d all ready be in prison stripes.
And we know it.
And it pisses us off.
35
posted on
11/01/2016 9:58:52 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: xzins
I think the Democrats have figured out that the FBI has everything. The only way Huma had 600,000+ emails is if she did a full backup “insurance policy” download.
If the FBI has it all, there is no way Hillary Clinton can avoid impeachment and prosecution.
So the Democrats have to decide if they are willing to trade 20 years of political exile, which would be the result of a Hillary impeachment and conviction, for 18 months of an embattled Clinton Presidency.
At this point, their best option is a Trump victory. Then they can work to pull down President Trump, and the Clintons will slip into the background. Frankly, if Trump wins, Obama could pardon the Clintons in December, and the vast majority of Americans would breathe a sigh of relief.
So now, all they have to do is lose in such a way that it does minimal damage to the party.
To: InterceptPoint
Not to a jury, or most judges.
37
posted on
11/01/2016 9:59:34 AM PDT
by
RinaseaofDs
(Truth, in a time of universal deceit, is courage)
To: xzins
Will this make any difference?
38
posted on
11/01/2016 10:00:02 AM PDT
by
JerseyDvl
(#NeverHillary and we won't forget the backstabbers and sellouts.)
To: xzins
This would get anyone else in US history indicted.
We better dump those emails!
Not even with the Nixonian “ But it would be wrong” qualifier
39
posted on
11/01/2016 10:00:05 AM PDT
by
RonnG
To: xzins
No, there was no “intent”, Comey said so...oh...wait...
40
posted on
11/01/2016 10:00:07 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-215 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson