Posted on 11/01/2016 9:46:20 AM PDT by xzins
put him onm the lie detector and ask him what he meant by “dump”
Project Veritas also promised more bombshells. Bottom line is Hillary has to be disposed of the old fashioned way, or with a stake through her heart. If her deleted emails were going to come out they would have done so by now. The hype is just hype.
In addition to the disputable definition/intent of the word “dump,” a local radio host wonders if this Wikileaks info would even be admissable in a trial given it’s been supplied via illegal means/hacking (provided the actual email corroborating is not recoverable that is, in which case the hack would become a tip;). Any legal eagles here to weigh in on this?
Obama can pardon the Clintons for criminal activity, but no Presidential pardon can keep her from being impeached while she is in office.
The only way to prevent the impeachment trial is to keep her from winning next week. The only way to keep the dirty laundry safely in the hamper is to prevent an impeachment trial.
A haiku:
Huma serves no more
She’s done licking that beaver
No more nude back rubs!
Silence falls at night
A deep sigh, a broken heart
An e-mail archive
That is clear conspiracy to obstruct justice. Nixon did nothing that egregious..
“Titled Destruction, Alteration or Falsification of Records in Federal Investigations and Bankruptcy, the provision was passed under Section 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The text of the statute is relatively straightforward:
“Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsified, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under Title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”18 usc 1519,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice
Of course Hillary actually did that with the 33,000 emails but here we see Mills and Podesta in the indictable conspiracy. Obama will grants Clemency to the entire rats nest as eraly as next Wednesday—
This is si blatant ,it is breath taking.
Prayers find spices.
Asses bite the pianos.
Papers splash armies.
Rats leaving the ship
Hillary’s future career:
Making license plates
We're not talking about just H-> here! Just how is it H->'s elite status could rightfully extend to Mills, when it didn't extend to CIA Director Gen. Petraeus, one of far higher rank?
I think it's pretty clear that Mills' immunity should be deemed to have been breached by her lie of "not remembering" such an extremely important event is this "dumping."
(Similarly, I trust Abedin's immunity agreement should be deemed to have been breached.)
HF
lol!
So you think Podesta would say to release to the public all the classified data in the emails ... what a maroon!
A64 31
Load another metal blank
A64 32
A64 33
America’s Dairyland
A64 34
A64 35
Keep you hand out of the press
A64 36
Evidence of “Mens Rea” “A Criminal Mind”
It depends on the meaning of the word “dump.” LOL
Is that the Peter Kadzik who will be the DOJ person in charge of any decision to charge Huma Weiner, nee Huma Abedin, aka ..., et al. with crimes, crimes against humanity, etc.
and cbutts.obama? Ewww!
Is it 65,000 Huma emails, or 650,000 Huma + A. Wiener emails? The NYPD and, now, FBI, knows, but I haven’t seen any confirmation. However, it is clear that hrc emails are part of the mix, whether forwards, from/to, cc, bcc, or all of the above.
My second best guess is that bill and hill had the same issue that A. Wiener had with the NYPD, and that NYPD will release by Friday if FBI maintains silence.
That could be sheisse
Lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.