Posted on 10/31/2016 9:14:12 AM PDT by ColdOne
(CNN)Republican former US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on Monday slammed the FBI director's recent actions in the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server. He called Comey's actions an "error in judgment" and said he is "somewhat perplexed about what the director was trying to accomplish here."
Gonzales said Comey's letter Friday informing lawmakers that the FBI is reviewing new emails potentially related to its investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state breaks from long-standing Justice Department practice. The protocol is not to comment on investigations and to
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Just think, remember how conservatives came to this man’s aid during the Bush administration when the leftists attacked him, this is our reward for that? More and more I see the Bush administrations, all three of them, as just as grave a threat to American liberty as these leftist scumbags we have now.
I will withhold judgement until Janet Waco weighs in.
There goes the neighborhood.
George W. Bush (in 2000) was the last Republican presidential candidate I ever voted for. I wasn't even a Trump supporter in the GOP campaign this time around, but I'm 100% behind him now. I've also donated money to his campaign -- which is something I've never done in my life.
Multiple Bushies are squawking loudly today. I wonder if they fear that links between the Bush and Clinton crime families will come out in some of those emails.
I sincerely regret voting for the elder Bush in 1992. I should have voted for Ross Perot.
and so?????
Holder is an idiot. He should just stay quiet and out of harm’s way, but like Carlos Danger, he wants to inject himself like he’s on the moral high ground.
It’s a big swamp.
Did they also criticize comey for not referring a drop shot criminal case? I thought not.
Comey had a political decision to make regardless
Assuming he has new mounds of evidence from Carlos Danger - does he wait until after the election, and then start pursuing a “President Clinton” immediately? If that happens, does he then simply drop the investigation entirely, because he’ll also be accused of being “overtly political” by interfering with a “new President?” Does he simply bury the new evidence?
At that point, he’s directly aiding the Clintons in a cover-up. If he sweeps it all under the rug simply to avoid the charge of being “political” what then what happens to his reputation?
Eric Holder? Hey Eric still running guns? Or living the high life of the Marc Rich Pardon kickbacks?
Gonzales was one of Bush II’s worst appointments.
Gonzales was part of the Bush cabal and not surprisingly, a NeverTrumper.
Do any of these folks slamming Comey now (funny they didn’t slam him for ignoring the law earlier) have any concerns about whether or not Weiner had ready access to National Security info on his unsecured computer????
Do we need any more proof of the uniparty?
Eric Holder, who refused to cooperate with Congress re Fast and Furious?
THAT Eric Holder?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.