[kabar]

Watching Steffy and his guests trying to spin what is happening. They claim that nothing will probably be found. The FBI is still seeking a warrant to look at the information so they really don't know if anything criminal has taken place.

If the FBI is prevented from reviewing the information, then we will really have a Constitutional crisis on our hands.

[Alas Babylon!]

There is one glitch for them, and it is this.

I think Trump now wins.

All this news is devastating to Hillary’s campaign, and the voters, not the lawyers, not the prosecutors, nor even the news media, will be the final arbitrators.

And a Trump win will fix all those other problems about them stonewalling or weaseling out of a proper investigation.

I think we all owe a prayer of THANK YOU to God above, I really do. I think he’s giving America one more chance with Trump.

[bray]

All the Queen’s men and all the Queen’s horses couldn’t put Harpy Dumpty together again.

[grey_whiskers]

AIEEE.

Watching Steffy and his guests trying to spin what is happening. They claim that nothing will probably be found. The FBI is still seeking a warrant to look at the information so they really don't know if anything criminal has taken place.

If the FBI is prevented from reviewing the information, then we will really have a Constitutional crisis on our hands.

Or, from https://twitter.com/youngdems4trump/status/752960915444633601:

Charles McCullough III :CAN YOU PROVIDE THIS COMMITTEE IN A SECURE FORMAT THE CLASSIFIED EMAILS?

>> I CAN TO A CERTAIN EXTENT. I CANNOT PROVIDE A CERTAIN SEGMENT OF THEM BECAUSE THE AGENCY THAT OWNS THE INFORMATION FOR THOSE EMAILS HAS LIMITED THE DISTRIBUTION ON THOSE, SO THEY ARE CHARACTERIZING THEM AS OR ORCON.

>> EXPLAIN THAT.

>> ORIGINATOR CONTROL. I CAN'T GIVE THEM TO YOU WITHOUT AGENCY'S PERMISSION TO PROVIDE YOU.

>> WHICH AGENCY?

>> I CAN'T SAY THAT IN OPEN HEARING, SIR.

>> YOU CAN EVEN TELL ME WHICH AGENCY WON'T ALLOW US AS MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO SEE SOMETHING THAT HILLARY CLINTON ALLOWED SOMEBODY WITHOUT A SECURITY CLEARANCE IN A NONPROTECTIVE FORMAT TO SEE, IS THAT CORRECT?

>> THIS IS THE SEGMENT OF EMAILS -- THIS IS WHY MY LETTER BACK TO RANKING MEMBER CUMMINGS HAD TO BE CLASSIFIED BECAUSE PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS SEGMENT OF EMAILS AND THIS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE NOT JUST WITH YOU AND YOUR COMMITTEE BUT WITH SEVERAL MEMBERS AT THIS POINT. SO WE HAVE GONE BACK TO THE AGENCY THAT IS INVOLVED SEVERAL TIMES AND WE CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT AGAIN AND ASK PERMISSION.

>> CAN YOU GENERALLY TELL ME -- BECAUSE THEY ARE SO SENSITIVE ABOUT SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE, HUMAN INTELLIGENCE? WHAT?

>> WE SHOULDN'T GET INTO THE CONTENT OF THESE EMAILS IN AN OPEN HEARING.

>> OKAY. I DON'T WANT TO VIOLATE THAT BUT THE CONCERN IS IT HAS ALREADY BEEN VIOLATED AND WAS VIOLATED BY HILLARY CLINTON AND IT WAS HER CHOICE, SHE SET IT UP AND SHE CREATE THIS PROBLEM AND SHE CREATED THIS MESS. WE SHOWN HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS BUT SHE DID THAT.

>> THIS IS THE SEGMENT OF EMAILS THAT I HAD TO HAVE PEOPLE IN MY OFFICE WRITE INTO PARTICULAR PROGRAMS TO SEE THESE EMAILS. WE DIDN'T POSSESS THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES.

>> EVEN THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DIDN'T HAVE THE CLEARANCE?

>> YES.

>> UNBELIEVABLE. WHAT A MESS. I'LL YIELD BACK. JUDGE FROM MARYLAND,

Show Less Text

01:06:45

[patriotspride]

Watching Steffy and his guests trying to spin what is happening. They claim that nothing will probably be found

---

Hope Assange proves that wrong and has direct Hilly/Huma stuff that has to have been on one or the others computers, and that the FBI already knows is on Weiners hence their taking this pre-emptive step to CTA ( cover their A )

[Morgan in Denver]

Someone had to have looked at something or the FBI wouldn’t have reopened the Hillary server case. Someone saw something that triggered the decision. It may have been the NYPD for all I know but the FBI would not have reopened it otherwise.