Posted on 10/29/2016 4:56:53 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
Top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin has told people she is unsure how her emails could have ended up on a device she viewed as her husband’s computer, the seizure of which has reignited the Clinton email investigation, according to a person familiar with the investigation and civil litigation over the matter.
The person, who would not discuss the case unless granted anonymity, said Abedin was not a regular user of the computer, and even when she agreed to turn over emails to the State Department for federal records purposes, her lawyers did not search it for materials, not believing any of her messages to be there.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
So many criminals! So little Time!
If the warrant states that they are searching for HER stuff, they might not take his.
Hillary didn’t “intend”, Huma didn’t “know”.
Huma is responsible for concealing HRC’s failing health. Obviously, she will say and do anything on the path to the Oval Office as Hillary’s ValJar.
Appreciate your reply.
How do the Black Berries tie in?
Note that the aide also as a Mac.
How did they get on that computer? I don’t know anything about it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTSYPg-KxhQ
My apologies, was Butterdezillion
That’s funny. 500 million yahoo accounts got hacked in 2014, weird Wiener was using the devices to text kids.
So the F.B.I. can’t look at what is most likely been posted on the dark web and a perv has had access to them for years.
It’s quite likely that at this point they don’t know what’s in the emails.
Under a warrant from the Weiner case Huma’s emails are not relevant.
They would know the addressees of the emails though.
Apparently some of the addressees are at state.gov or hrc.com.
Should be a breeze to get warrants to look at them though.
But apparently a hurricane is blowing from the White House to prevent that.
Fun stuff!
“end up that Huma is an Iranian Spy and Weiner is an Israeli Massad Agent.”
Not enough popcorn in all of Iowa for that show LOL!@
Number ONE concern.
HilLIARy, claimed she wanted to carry only one device when the State Department wanted to issue one of their own specialized secure Blackberries. She refused to accept their secure Blackberry preferring her own. But later it was revealed she not only had her Blackberry but also had an iPhone and an iPad. That's three devices.
She also claimed she couldn't have more than one email address on her device. . . But that is patently false. Blackberries, iPhones, and iPads can all handle multiple email addresses from multiple and SECURE email sources. Right now, the iPhones and iPads are the most secure as the data on them is encrypted by default to the 256bit Advanced Encryption Standard using a very complex encryption key would take 5.62 undecillion years (that's 5.52 times 10195 years) using the best super computer we now have to crack using brute force. None of the other mobile phones do that by default, or do it in hardware.
During HilLIARy's tenure as Secratary of State, she went through THIRTEEN Blackberry phones. . . Only two of which were destroyed by the means of smashing them with hammers (per testimony) but the others were somehow lost by HilLIARy with an unknown number of emails still on them.
HilLIARy refused to use any of the State Department's secure terminals to send or receive documents because, it was testified to, she did not know how to use a computer, only knowing how to use her Blackberry. Therefore the ONLY way she could conduct her necessary duties as Secretary of State was for someone to copy secure and classified up to and beyond Top Secret documents, remove their classified markings, then move them to a non-secure server in the open-net and email them to her Blackberry so she could read them and respond! She then often forwarded these "sanitized" but STILL classified documents to people who were NOT CLEARED to receive, much less see or read them, often people outside of government or even our nation, from her Blackberry! Sometimes these were members of the Clinton Foundation or the Clinton Global Initiative who had made "donations" to receive insider access or information.
Somehow, Director Comey could not find any intent to handle Top Secret and Classified data negligently in all of these steps . . . But of course the law governing this does not REQUIRE intent for a criminal act or punishment, only that the person behind it be negligent. But I see lots of intent. . . Such as an intent of avoiding leaving a trail of her emails behind.
Weiner was upset he got probed and she took away his kid. So now he’s getting even with her. If she’s at Gitmo he thinks he’ll get the kid back.
Funny thing. Emails are like a line segment. They have two endpoints which can be independently archived. Deleting one endpoint doesn’t delete the other. Who knew? Server wipers?
Didn’t PRyno used to drive one of those?
They got on his computer through Yahoo.
Yahoo says 500 million accounts stolen
http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/22/technology/yahoo-data-breach/
The software on the devices has to be complicit. The cloud has little to do with Device A’s explicitly turned off connection capability being able to be turned on and left on by (previously linked) Device B’s request for connection.
Exactly!!
That moron Anthony Weiner is being set up as the fall guy.
Everything will turn out to be his fault.
Anthony Weiner: Don't be alone where.
Go into hiding someplace and keep plenty of friends around too!
Intent is apparently not an element of this crime by H->! . Comey is a corrupt clown cop.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.