To: silentknight
The point is it was illegal and she directly participated.
11 posted on
10/24/2016 10:01:50 AM PDT by
FR_addict
(Ryan needs to go!)
To: FR_addict
What is this, felony 783 or 84?
15 posted on
10/24/2016 10:04:09 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(17 days: Until Presdient Pre-elect becomes President Elect Donald J. Trump. Help is on the way!)
To: FR_addict
Donald Duck is a good smoke screen to cover the illegal server and all of the classified emails that are far more damaging.
To: FR_addict
The point is it was illegal and she directly participated.
Unfortunately, not.
They state that she was the one who wanted the ducks, but they also state that it was originally going to be a DNC project, but switched over because of Donna Brazile.
They don't explicitly say that Hillary ordered the ducks after the project moved away from the DNC, or before. Had this remained a DNC run operation, it would not have been illegal, what made it illegal was that it was being run by a PAC, yet managed by a campaign.
So, all the campaign has to say to insulate Clinton is, 'sure she wanted ducks - when it was a DNC run operation'.
80 posted on
10/24/2016 10:31:01 AM PDT by
MMaschin
(The difference between strategy and tactics!)
To: FR_addict
They have no proof she participated. They have people who said she participated.
The required level of evidence isn’t there.
Even if you had Hillary in person on video, nothing would happen. Nothing happened on the email stuff, with much more evidence.
99 posted on
10/24/2016 10:37:26 AM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson