Posted on 10/23/2016 8:43:03 PM PDT by conservativepoet
We all knew the corrupt media polls were BS. Now thanks to Wikileaks we know our assumptions were correct. The media was working with Hillary Clinton to release bogus weighted polls that show Hillary ahead of Trump.
And then step two was to declare the election over.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Actually, it wasn’t Trump so much as it was the little delicate snowflake Trump fans who couldn’t entertain any sort of debate or discussion but who constantly tattled to the moderators to preserve their “safe space.” That and the Russia Today Putin fans.
They acted like Democrats do - with vindictive and jackbooted demands for complete conformity of thought - and it was [and is] hurting their candidate by p!$$ing off potential converts.
Stop the whining already.
You would have called the other one “QUESTIONABLE” too, before it was discovered as an attachment in an email ... Either that CTR document will be revealed in some future Wikileaks release, or something very much like it ... Meanwhile the Dem playbook merrily res ipsa’s along ...
> You would have called the other one “QUESTIONABLE” too, before it was discovered as an attachment in an email
No I wouldn’t, and that you assert I would is very very very very strange.
bookmark
“Soros said that he expects Trump to win the popular vote by a landslide but to lose the electoral vote. To me that says that they will use the same scheme that got Obama his second term: cheat in the heavily-democrat precincts of critical toss-up states. Either that, or bribe electors to vote against their popular vote winner.”
“..so it will be reported a close race clear up to the finish line.”
Excellent summary caww. I believe there’s one more reason they want to keep reporting it as a close race to the very last minute, and that is so when the inevitable accusations of fraud start making the front page, the genuine fraud will be easier to hide.
There will be very obvious cases of voter fraud in certain areas, such as the traditional ones (can I say that yet?) where there’s more votes cast than registered voters, or the areas where EVERY single registered voter went for Hillary. There’s no chance the GOP arm of the Uniparty will investigate any of it since they have made it clear they don’t have a dog in this fight. But unlike Willard, if (God forbid) Trump was to lose, I DO believe he will spend plenty of his own money hiring crews to expose the fraud in those areas and try to get either the ‘real’ results, or have the fraudulent votes disqualified.
However, these obvious cases of fraud will primarily serve as a distraction from the massive, nationwide, fraud that will be going on right under everyone’s noses, and will only be exposed by chance and in very limited circumstances. Again, I hope I’m wrong, but this widespread fraud will be through the use of the electronic voting tabulating machines, when either before the polls open, or perhaps even during Election Day where a data chip is inserted into the tabulator, the machines will be re-programmed to change only just enough votes from Trump to Hillary, to make it appear as it was a VERY close race. There’s now quite a few videos out there that do an excellent job at showing how the vote tabulating machines can be rigged, but I like this one best: http://dennismichaellynch.com/really-happening-votes/ The need to have the polls show in advance that it’s a very close race only serves to condition the public in advance to the fraudulent “very close” results, close enough to not give the appearance of obvious fraud.
Every time I see recent photos or videos of Hillary and see the confidence within her (other than the anger and rage someone occasionally captures, which is just her true nature being exposed), I can only conclude that she exhibits that genuine self assurance because she has been directly told to not worry, that the Uniparty oligarchy has it under control. I sincerely hope I am wrong, and I am doing everything I possibly can to combat fraud and to get people to vote for Trump, but IF Hillary supposedly wins, it will be because of this electronic voter fraud. One other thought... All those early an absentee votes are the easiest to manipulate because in most cases there are not the standard/usual election clerks, judges, poll watchers, and poll challengers available to keep an eye on those ballots. I am a strong advocate of voting only on Election Day when at all possible.
So if you get polled, say that you *were* going to vote HRC, but now that she’s already won, no need to go vote at all.
It’s like a game to see how long it takes for people to actually read the original article and see it bases its claims on a document that has nothing at all to do with Wikileaks, but instead comes from a different source.
If one wanted to prove to oneself that people in general don’t read the articles at all and just knee-jerk comment on them, this thread would suffice to convince.
” I can only conclude that she exhibits that genuine self assurance because she has been directly told to not worry, that the Uniparty oligarchy has it under control.”
Remember, a few months ago Obama promised us that Clinton *would* be president. He meant it.
No. RINOmney’s job was to attract voters. He failed. Heck, he gave up campaigning at the end.
The blame rests on his failures as a candidate. Being A wearer of magic underwood was just one issue among many.
It's not hard to see through this strategy. All the media outlets use the same talking points: such as "It's been another rough week for Trump" and always referring to his campaign as "embattled" or "floundering", etc. It's always being reported that Trump's path to 270 is "narrowing."
Their strategy is to sow seeds of despair among Trump voters and create the impression that he cannot win.
Fact is, we all get out to vote on Nov 8th and Trump wins. They know that. So their strategy is to discourage us and make us throw our hands up in surrender.
Maybe but don’t forget: Trump isn’t running against a politician, he is running against a criminal enterprise.
Will be early voting in Texas today (first possible day) for Trump.
I think it’s going to backfire. trump supporters will come out of the woodwork if they think he’s down, hildabeests ignorant masses may stay home thinking she’s got it in the bag!
He should demand such obvious bogus results be thrown out and (later) that all related election officials be investigated by a special prosecutor.
this widespread fraud will be through the use of the electronic voting tabulating machines
You're right, these units should be outlawed and smashed with hammers. We need serial numbered paper ballots, marked with a pen, voter/citizen IDs, and purple ink on the finger.
The "oversampling" doc is legit from WikiLeaks. I'm referring to the second doc Gateway Pundit links to, the "internal memo." It reads "too good to be real," and its provenance is super-sketchy.
I read it a few days ago and tracked it down to here,
but there is NO other source.
My only point was to raise a red flag about this second document Hoft linked to.
For all the critics to my original comment (I forget I've been here so long most of my old FRiends are no longer here and a lot of people don't know me) I should have added that I HAVE NO DOUBT that the media is INDEED trying to discourage Trump supporters with bogus polls and declaring the election over.
I am a beyond-diehard Trump supporter, donate to him monthly, have signed up to be a poll watcher for the campaign. Trump is our beloved nation's last chance and I will crawl over broken glass to help him in any way possible.
I just want to make sure we check everything out before we run with it - it has been reported that the other side is deliberately creating false docs to muddy the waters so when Trump supporters use them, the Clintonoids can discredit both the genuine leaked docs and those who fall for any bogus docs.
That is all. Just be careful.
See post 118
See post 118. I'm sorry I wasn't clear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.