The "oversampling" doc is legit from WikiLeaks. I'm referring to the second doc Gateway Pundit links to, the "internal memo." It reads "too good to be real," and its provenance is super-sketchy.
I read it a few days ago and tracked it down to here,
but there is NO other source.
My only point was to raise a red flag about this second document Hoft linked to.
For all the critics to my original comment (I forget I've been here so long most of my old FRiends are no longer here and a lot of people don't know me) I should have added that I HAVE NO DOUBT that the media is INDEED trying to discourage Trump supporters with bogus polls and declaring the election over.
I am a beyond-diehard Trump supporter, donate to him monthly, have signed up to be a poll watcher for the campaign. Trump is our beloved nation's last chance and I will crawl over broken glass to help him in any way possible.
I just want to make sure we check everything out before we run with it - it has been reported that the other side is deliberately creating false docs to muddy the waters so when Trump supporters use them, the Clintonoids can discredit both the genuine leaked docs and those who fall for any bogus docs.
That is all. Just be careful.
Okay. Makes sense.
My apologies—now I see and agree with your assessment.
Thanks for the explanation. I thought maybe you’d gone to the dark side. lol! And you’re right about not many people knowing us anymore. The reverse is true for me: I no longer recognize most of the people here.
And I miss Wallaby and his research skills immensely. ;-)