I really wish Trump had pointed out in the debate that the survival rate of babies delivered that late was so high and that an early delivery was an option for women whose health is in danger from the pregnancy.
Killing the baby is NOT necessary if the mother needs to be saved. It’s simple an excuse the liberals use to justify murdering the baby and supporting their abortion agenda.
It’s obvious talking about abortion is what Hillary does best, and Trump’s knowledge seemed common sense but limited.
BTW, this is kind of off topic, it have noticed that MeGYN Ryan spells her name with a “gyn”? Think that’s to make a point?
I have been saying this forever. Have a C Section. Babies have a very good chance of survival born in the 3th trimester.
My niece’s triplets were born in the 3rd trimester and after less than a month all 3 are home.
There is never a reason for a late term abortion. Have the baby and place it for adoption.
What do these women tell their family, friends co-workers, etc. when they ask about the baby. Certainly they don’t admit to such a horrible act of killing a 7,8,9 month old baby. Do they say it was a still birth, I just can’t imagine what story they tell.
I can understand ectopic pregnancies though, but even those are really early on.
In order to understand the liberal position, you need to understand that they are not talking about saving the life of the mother. They want abortion up until the last second and they will use weasel words and lawyerly loopholes to get what they want.
When they say “the health of the mother is at risk”, they don’t mean that she is in danger of dying. They mean that her mental health is at risk. If she had a child, she might be stressed out or depressed. Or possibly they are referring to her financial health.
They like to imply that the woman’s life is at stake in order to manipulate people to feel sorry for the mother and sympathize with the idea of abortion. But the reality is far different from what they imply.
+1