Posted on 10/20/2016 2:30:03 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
According to Sarah Westwood, at the Washington Examiner, fewer than half of the projects undertaken by the Clinton Global Initiative since 2005 have been completed, with roughly a third underway and more than 200 others "stalled" or "unfulfilled."
Between 2005-2015 there were 3,452 commitments made through CGI. Of those, according to the newly disclosed report, six percent were unfulfilled, or failed.
But that number might not tell the whole story. An additional 11 percent of commitments in the report and excluded from the analysis are labeled unresponsive, which means that no progress has been reported in more than two years. Its likely that some, or perhaps most, of those commitments also didnt succeed, though impossible to determine due to a lack of information. A further 2 percent of commitments are stalled.
One thing the CGI always succeeds at is the glittery gatherings of elites at its meetings, such as the current gala underway in Atlanta, June 12-14.
For all the glitz, the CGIs trajectory is downward. Westwood notes:
According to the report, the Clinton Global Initiative received an all-time low number of commitments in 2015, the year Hillary Clinton launched her presidential campaign and drew a deluge of negative attention to the Clinton Foundation's work.
I have no information on any Clinton political operatives who have worked in off years for the CGI, but we know that the Clinton Foundation has served to keep the machine apparatchiks funded while not actively engaged in campaigning. Id also be interested in knowing what percentage of the moneys raised has gone to lavish meetings and first-class travel.
Sunlight, as the saying goes, is the best disinfectant. I suspect that the list of corporations willing to be identified as funders of the CGI is declining with every revelation of Clinton malfeasance.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Hily needed to empty her colostomy bag, heh?
And Hillary and gang should be sent a FULL BILL for every penny. But, what do you want to bet they don’t bill her a penny because they are dims?
Huma saves it to worship to later with Carlos Danger the perv hubbie
Oh ahreed
They do not need thousands of people. Just the big donors like the Saudi’s and others in the mideast who bribed the Clintons with at least $35 million.
Bookmark
On the way
...CLI. just sent $1.8 billion to bank in Qatar
On the way
...CLI. just sent $1.8 billion to bank in Qatar
" Authorities need only show that the Clinton Foundation filed materially misleading financial information but kept on fundraising for a myriad of do-good projects."
<><> ITEM---The criminal element's MO to hide larger crimes is to falsify official documents.
Ortel has noted that state AG's could shut down the C/F (same way 25 state A/G's stopped Obama's immigration E/O's.)
=========================================
<><> ITEM----The legal culpability of a tax-free "charity" consists of:
<><> soliciting and taking money, and,
<><> showing how they spend it.
==========================================
REPORT MAIL FRAUD AND ELECTRONIC FRAUD HERE:
MAIL FRAUD https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
ELECTRONIC FRAUD---FBI electronic fraud unit--FBI tip page
============================================
In addition to the highly visible Clinton Global Initiative, there are several separate Clinton foundations that maintain their own revenue streams. All these entities maintain separate operations for the Clintons pay-to-play global racketeering operations:
<><>the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI),
<><>the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton (BHCC) Foundation,
<><>the Clinton Foundation Hong Kong,
<><> William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (Kenya),
<><>William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (UK),
<><> the Clinton Foundation Insalingsstiftelse (Sweden).
<><> the Clinton/Guistra Partnership, Canada.
Typical of the Clinton’s, leaving crap wherever they go for other people to clean up.
That brings up a point: the Constitution indicates that US government employees are presumptively corrupt if they go hat in hand to foreign governments:This means that even if (contrary to all evidence) the Clinton Foundation were pure as the wind-driven snow, it would take an act of Congress to legitimate a single foreign government donation to an organization in which the sitting Secretary of State was a principal, and which was named after her.
- Article 1 Section 9:
- No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state
You or I could accept such an advantage from a foreign government - but then, you nor I are Secretary of State, able to do favors for any such government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.