WIKILEAKS: Hillary Took Algeria Off Terror Watch List After Donation to Clinton Foundation

The Gateway Pundit ^ | Oct 20th, 2016 | Jim Hoft

[detective]

A new Wikileaks document reveals Hillary took Algeria off the US terror watch list after they made a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti relief project.

How is that legal?

The Clinton camp was discussing Joe Scarborough’s discussion on the Algerian donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton advisors defended the move in the email saying it’s “legal gray area.”

[detective]

This is a must read article.

Clinton corruption and treason is exposed.

[KSCITYBOY]

btt

[lacrew]

Mr. QUID...Meet Mr. QUO

[MNJohnnie]

Clinton SOP. Lie and rely on you lap dog “News Media” to regurgitate the lie without question.

[Buckeye McFrog]

bbb.....bbbbbu......bbb.....bbbbut Trump touched a yoga instructor’s BOOB at the US Open....

[chris37]

That’s swell.

Maybe they can send some terrorists over to buy some guns in our stores since they are off the terror lists and use them in mass shootings so the Democrats can dance in our blood and implement their gun control agenda.

So glad to know those lists are based on criteria that matters, like how much did you donate to the Goddamned Clintons? (I’m sorry, God, but I can’t take it.)

Evil bitch.

[rxsid]

"The Clinton advisors defended the move in the email saying it’s “legal gray area.”"

That's their defense for all of this criminal, treasonous activity...

No intention to do wrong
Didn't know it was illegal
etc..

[Telepathic Intruder]

Corruption within corruption. Most of the Haiti relief cash never made it to the Haitians.

[CatOwner]

Didn’t this decision still need to be signed off by Obama? If they didn’t dislike (or hate) each other, I would say the Obamas are getting some funds through the Clinton Foundation.

[Travis McGee]

[HamiltonJay]

This has been known for a long time.. Algeria wanted fighters, which we would not sell them as long as on the watch list... they made a big donation, and poof off the watch list and got their fighters....

So this isn’t new, other than the emails just confirm what was already known.

[dead]

If you read the Wikileaks document in question, it is not a new accusation. It's the Hillary team gloating that Scarborough reported the Algeria story incorrectly and their going to use it to discredit him. According to Team Hillary in this Wikileaks, Algeria was never on the list, so there was no quid pro quo to remove them.

I don't know why Gateway Pundit is portraying this differently than it is.

[mrsmith]

Seems a lot of sites are jumping the gun on these leaks.
The major media can get away with intentional bias but minor media just discredit themselves.

Of course they do get ‘clicks’ in the meanwhile.

[Dante3]

bttt

[hoosiermama]

More and more.
One would think there is so much corruption it was done to overwhelm the system. ..... Alinsky

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

Now that we know that the leadership of every branch of the federal government is corrupt, these kinds of things don't matter.

That's what's really at stake in this election-government accountability.

[SkyPilot]

[Fiddlstix]

[Henchster]

The Clinton advisors defended the move in the email saying it’s "legal gray area."

They were unable to use the term "No Controlling Legal Authority" because Al Gore has it in the "Social Security Lockbox."

[liberalh8ter]

Exactly. I had to read this thing twice because Algeria wasn’t on the list. It’s acknowledged they had/have human rights issues but these sites need to stop misrepresenting these emails. When it’s proven otherwise it makes Wikileaks look bad.....then again, that may be the plan.