Posted on 10/20/2016 12:22:04 PM PDT by ColdOne
At the end of the debate, while Hillary was droning on with snippets rehearsed, Trump gave the best description of Hillary. He said, "Such a nasty woman." Who could disagree with that? She is nasty and a woman.
On substance and manner, Trump was clearly the winner. Hillary gave her usual robotic answers sprinkled with cheap shots, which is her preparation for the past week.
Trump brought out that the violence at his rally in Chicago and other rallies was caused by operatives of the Clinton campaign. Hillary did not deny it.
On the Middle East disaster in Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Libya, Trump clearly stated that Obama and Hillary, as secretary of state, caused the disaster by withdrawing from Iraq without leaving a force. Hilary did not deny it.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I figured Kaine was chosen to serve as Hillary’s impeachment insurance.
He surely wasn’t meant to be an actual VP, was he?
I totally agree with you about the choice of Pence. I figure with all of his experience in business, Trump is by now an expert in hiring the best people for the jobs.
I get what it means. I just didn’t understand his repeated use of it in situations that didn’t seem to call for it. That’s all.
BTW, I’ve been here since November of 1998. I just got a different name that more fits me (think Green Acres).
“I honestly did not get the “nasty woman” comments.”
Although I do not remember the specific comment, she had just made a particularly vicious comment. That was his reason for saying, “Such a nasty woman.”
It’s certainly evil. And I agree it sold its soul to the devil. It needs a stake through its heart and its head lopped off. Where’s Ash when you need him?
Gotta love Trump.....he is spot on with his description of her.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, but the pussy whipping of America must proceed apace, and we must all accept that this “ Such a nasty woman” just shows that he is prejudiced against women and gropes them! ( sarc.)
I have pointed out to everyone I speak to about politics these days that we have a pussy whip ploy that if allowed to be used by our political culture as a litmus test, means that we could no longer have a Theodore Roosevelt, a John F. Kennedy , a Ted Kennedy or a William J Clinton.
Therefore I conclude that the Pu$$y whipping ploy will not work in America, nor will it work against Donald Trump.
The ones closest to her know it best. I don’t understand why anyone would continue working for someone who flies into rages and calls people names. Is being close to power so important to them?
Thanks for agreeing with my gender designation for the Witch.
“Nasty woman” is putting it mildly. Clinton is a stain on the universe.
Yeah...
Here’s my thought on Yeb Bush or Marco Rollover:
I think my estimable opponent is a remarkable woman who has accomplished a great deal and provided a sterling example for young women everywhere, I just kinda sorta disagree a little bit on some of the puny details about how we’re gonna redistribute wealth in America, but otherwise I wanna go along to get along, honest!
Too funny! I was saying last night how Trump reminded me of Walter.
Sadly, yes.
While I commend Trump, I disagree:
One can be nasty without being profoundly evil.
Clinton is evil.
A nasty woman, a bitter shrew, a harridan,
only a single degree from being a crone.
Maybe that’s what trump should have called it,
Crone Corruption Inc.
Oops, left out sea Hag. Sorry.
Everybody SING!
Nasty woman, hobbling down the street.
Nasty woman,(insert verse of choice here).
OH!
The reactions of his other little friends!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.