Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack
Exactly. The whole purpose of that scheme was to support an inflated real estate market by subsidizing the process of underwriting loans that never should have been extended.

The people buying the homes thought they were the beneficiaries of this largesse, but they weren't. The ones who benefitted were: (1) the banks, and (2) the sellers of the homes.

35 posted on 10/20/2016 10:52:49 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The sellers of the homes only benefited until the bubble burst. Then they were left holding inflated property worth 1/2 to 1/3 of what they had paid for it.

If there had been some way to bet on the short market, you could have made a fortune. A blind man could see that the market was grossly inflated, just like the fake stock market during the so-called internet bubble.


36 posted on 10/20/2016 10:58:43 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson