Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

The sellers of the homes only benefited until the bubble burst. Then they were left holding inflated property worth 1/2 to 1/3 of what they had paid for it.

If there had been some way to bet on the short market, you could have made a fortune. A blind man could see that the market was grossly inflated, just like the fake stock market during the so-called internet bubble.


36 posted on 10/20/2016 10:58:43 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
A seller was only left holding the bag if they sold one home and purchased another one in the same inflated market.

I'm not sure how often that was the case, but keep in mind that in the mid-2000s the "seller" was often a residential homebuilder who was putting up cheaply-built houses as fast as he could, and walking away with the proceeds of the sale after paying his expenses.

37 posted on 10/20/2016 11:01:26 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson