There have been open source guesses before, but a former high government official just blabbed a confirmation during a debate.
Amazing. Even if she or her minions hide behind the “citing open sources” defense, the terrible judgement of using something as specific and sensitive as that as a political tool in such a spectacularly public way is proof positive that she is unfit for any job requiring discretion, much less the Presidency.
Perhaps as her chance at this prize she so badly wants slips away for the last time, she will become unhinged at the “unfairness” of having her secrets exposed by Wikileaks and retaliate at the peons who who support Trump by exposing secrets she’s been entrusted with, subconsciously or out of sheer spite.
They may have to lock her up before the election!
Beautiful explanation. Regardless of the actual classification of this information, the poor judgement of even discussing these sensitive subjects in public is astounding!
She’s good at memorizing or reading a speech or a debate script, but her off-scripted remarks and lies are killing her campaign:
“At this point, what difference does it make?!”
“We came, we saw, he died. Ha ha Ha ha”
“Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?”
“50% of Trump’s supporters are deplorable. Islamaphobic...”
“I got the girl’s rapist off, even though he was guilty. Ha ha Ha ha”
Incredible.
Whenever Trump says something outrageous, he’s doing it purposely to drive a media agenda — or to get voters to start thinking deeper about a subject.
With Hillary, getting her off-script is deadly to her campaign. This is why they lock her up in her room and only let her come out in public once a week.