Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/19/2016 8:21:06 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Kaslin

My thoughts on tonight’s debate, the 3rd presidential debate:

Supreme Court:

2nd Amendment: Trump absolute support, as intended by the founders. Clinton uses all sorts of legaleze against it.

Partial Birth Abortion (ie. the horrible dismemberment/killing of nine month term babies in the wonud): Trump absolutely against it saying it should never happen. Clinton absolutely for it.

Immigration:

Trump for controlled borders, modern, workable wall, finging. fighting and ridding the cuntry of the Mexican cartels, deportation of illegals, must come in legally. Halt to Syrian/Mid-east refugees who cannot be vetted.

Clinton for open amnesty, open borders, huge increase to mid-east/Syrian refugees, etc.

Taxation:

Clinton for a massive tax increase, including (though they did not quote her tonight) on the middle class. Huge increase on corporation (whih will drive more jobs away). Furhter destroy the free economic engine of this country. Massive public works/government prgrams for jobs.

Trump massive tax cut to corporation to draw them and their jobs back to America. Also a tax decrease to all, to genergate more small business. Restart the free economic engine of this country.

Obama Care:

Clinton. Keep it but make it even stronger and “better”.

Trump, repeal and replace it with a market drvien strategy, openining state borders to all who want to provide care across those borders.

In General:

Clinton clearly wants to, and would be proud to, double down on Obama’s policies. She is a marxist and wwatns to institute absolute marxust poilicies on American whole grain

Trump is an American entrepreneaur who wants to restart the free market and undertstands that if he can do that, the market will grow massively and when coupled with sound fiscal policy and spending, will resolve the debt, unemplyment, growth, the GDP, etc.

Trump trully wants to and is serious about making American Great again. He believe it.

The naysayers said al the same things about Reagan, how his economics could not work. I lived through it. It was th strngest econmic period for the country in my life and really saved a faltering nation in the eraly 80s...this nation.

Trump will do the same if the American people can see through the flim-flam men supporting the DNC, the MSM, and the RINOs.
I pray they can, and that God in Heaven allows their already obvious anger and frustration with life-long, establishment politicians and their lies, and ploys...to move them to choose the right on November 8th and make Donald Trump our next Prsident wth Mike Pence as his VP.


50 posted on 10/19/2016 8:54:46 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

To be the best of the moderators isn’t saying much, but he was better than the rest in the q’s he posed. He just should have shut her up better. He’d say “Madame Secretary....” and she’d just roll right over him till she was finished with what she had to say. I can’t even stand the thought of having to listen to that voice for four years, God forbid.


53 posted on 10/19/2016 8:55:46 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Chris Wallace was a better moderator than the others in the same way as Bill Clinton was a better president than Obama.


55 posted on 10/19/2016 8:58:14 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The best I’ll say for Wallace is that he sucked less than the other mods.


63 posted on 10/19/2016 9:01:11 PM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent MajorityStands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Donald was restrained, trying to make the media feel good. He still did well, If he had been cut lose, he would have been a stick of dynamite


72 posted on 10/19/2016 9:10:52 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (proawaki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Both did well, but the advantage was Trump's

Hillary lied well. She did her robot stuff ok, but she really lit up when she was able to slander Trump early in her answers before doing her robot answers on policy.

Trump was left in the difficult position of correcting the slander or talking about policy. I think he balanced it better than the other debates. He erred more on the side of getting his policy messages out and he let the slander build before hitting back with brutal honesty. Of course the downside is he was not able to address all of the slander and lies, since Hillary is a lie machine extraordinaire.

In the end I think Hilary was playing the prevent-defense to keep the Donald from scoring too many points. Her objective was to hang on rather than win, and she played it well.

Trump did score some points but not many...but I also think he may have caught the golden snitch without anybody noticing and won the election in a different way.

He wasn't trying to make Hillary look worse. He was trying to fix his own image, and I think he had more success than people realize.

He came across as somebody who wants to help the nation rather than somebody that wants to help himself. Hillary came across as a control freak that nobody really likes.

81 posted on 10/19/2016 9:24:10 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I was at work and could not hear everything but I don’t think this debate moved the needle much if at all. One co-worker (an independent) said he thought Wallace was the best person on the stage.

I wanted so badly, when Hillary said “you’ve never apologized” to hit back with the Benghazi mother and ask her then and there to apologize to the mother to her face. It could have been devastating but Trump didn’t go there. It would have been a knockout blow.


85 posted on 10/19/2016 9:26:43 PM PDT by OrangeHoof ("If you cain't run yo own house, you cain't run da White House. Cain't do it." - Michelle Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Luntz tweeted clips of the “dials” that shows she CRATERED on answers about Clinton Foundation and her anti-Putin rant.

Trump went thru the roof when he called out the State Dept. and when he hit her on corruption.

He won, and not by anywhere near “close”.


92 posted on 10/19/2016 9:30:47 PM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I can’t stand Chris Wallace and I found him completely annoying. He needs a voice transplant!


94 posted on 10/19/2016 9:31:26 PM PDT by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

CNN poll

Clinton won 52-39 (best showing for Trump of 3 debates)

Clinton won on economy 50-46
Trump won on immigration 50-48
Trump won on Supreme Court 49-48


96 posted on 10/19/2016 9:32:33 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Went to CNN to try to vote in their poll, but it was already closed with an article announcing the results way in favor of Hillary. Thought the Democrats believed in keeping things open long enough to allow the right to vote!


98 posted on 10/19/2016 9:32:51 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Trump could have OWNED the debate by turning Wallace's "will you accept the result" into a discussion on the O'Keefe Democrat election fixer video -- and how he was fired today. There was absolutely no need to answer the question, and it was disastrous for him to say he wouldn't and would leave us "in suspense." Imbicilic...and DON'T YOU DARE tell me otherwise.

You can't make even ONE error like that with this enemedia. NOT ONE. And he did.

106 posted on 10/19/2016 9:44:41 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No way. Trump was the clear winner - by a mile.


108 posted on 10/19/2016 9:46:19 PM PDT by indcons (Blue Lives Matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I hate focus groups. Worst kind of research available.


135 posted on 10/19/2016 10:33:40 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I heard Trump won the CNN Focus Group by a margin of 10-5.


161 posted on 10/20/2016 12:19:39 AM PDT by SweetPatriot84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Luntz’ group was 14 - 12 for Trump.


179 posted on 10/20/2016 4:24:51 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Luntz’s head is going to be in this years Macy Day Parade.


190 posted on 10/20/2016 5:33:36 AM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Win 2/1 yet “it was close”.

Only in American “Journalism” can you find this level of habitual intellectual incompetence.


200 posted on 10/20/2016 6:06:49 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Undecided=Delusional


206 posted on 10/20/2016 6:29:12 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson