Posted on 10/16/2016 11:01:25 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary
Are we witnessing a dishonest election? A between state comparison based on the used voting procedures of the 2016 Democratic Party Primary for the Presidency of the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at drive.google.com ...
also in 2012...nobama won all states without voter id and lost states with voter id.
when we instituted oting in Iraq and Afghanistan we had them dip their finger in a die to be sure they only voted once...we are at that point here folk in order to begin to clean up the slop the dems have created from the intentional dumbing down of the electorate
He moved back to Russia after the Soviet Union disintegrated, but maintained that Russia was still no democracy.
How can we help keep things honest?
Ping
Goes with your post
This is pretty damning.
Hillary won 34 contests about 60%
Bernie won 23 contests about 40%
For any given arbitrary selection of states roughly 60% should be Clinton and 40% Sanders.
Let us guess half the contests had a paper trail. This would be about 28 of them. They say Sanders got about half, or say 14 of them. The amount he might expect to get at his 40% success rate would only be 11.2. So he got 2.8 more than expected. There is nothing suspicious about that with such small samples.
Yes.
It's an unavoidable matter of record.
Everyone better download before its gone
They are talking about the votes in the states not between the states. If polling is to be believed, the expectation in the Clinton win states was she would get Y% of the vote, +/- the Margin of Error for the polls. Instead she got Y%x1.2, far above the expectation even far beyond the MOE would allow for. You might get 1 or maybe 2 states where either the polls were off or some other factor but in all the states? And only in those states where no paper record is kept to perform an audit? Suspicious, at the least, and worthy of further investigation. It could be some other reason, such as Bernie supporters not knowing how to use the voting machines (comical, I know, but it is just an example of possible innocent reasons for the unexpected results).
Also I don’t have the numbers at hand but didn’t Bernie win by massive amounts in states like WA and OR and WI? It could be that Hillary didn’t have a good outreach program in those places, and American history has revealed from time to time a candidate’s appeal can be very strong in regions and very modest in others. But in a 2 person race (which is what this was, more or less, the other candidates were barely blips on the radar as the party was very fractured and had to galvanize either you were with the woman and the corporate establishment or you were with the socialist asserting that everything that wasn’t nailed down should be given away as a Constitutional right).
That too could be excused by other reasons, but in a 2 person race you might expect either 50-50, or, a consistent margin for one of the two. Esp since Hillary really stood for nothing, she is a no policy status quo candidate. Maybe there are plenty of Dems who are turned off by the socialist message but would they predominate only in states that use voting machines?
Use an electric car?
In 2020 Hitlery will be re-elected with 98% of the vote, just like the Soviet leaders were.
If anyone went through this report and its mass amount of data, you realize three things: First, when all possible factors were considered, electronic voter fraud provides the only explanation for the discrepancies between paper trail versus non-paper trail states. Second,the Republican results showed no such discrepancies. Finally, this portends a clear threat to the integrity of the general election.
This is HUGE....the Democratic Primary was STOLEN, the same thing is about to occur in the GENERAL ELECTION.
Wow! This is a very big deal. Thanks for posting it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.