Shows Trump up big in their internal polling.
Look for more to come in the hours ahead. All the files were public for a while on 4chan.
“Shows Trump up big in their internal polling.”
Knew that’s why the MSM was scared to death.
As much as I’d love to believe it, I can’t. Even Brietbart polls don’t have Trump winning often.
Bkmrk.
4chan is chaotic but they have some shadowy people who have been prescient and productive, too.
I have seen A LOT of scandals there BEFORE I have seen them on UK publications and aggressive scandal-seeking US publications.
They have often been as fast as Drudge and have that same “go where the stink is” mindset.
The screencap i saw talked about Trump surging and up in a few key areas (CO) but not a massive surge... Must have been another screencap?
Hahahahaha! MAGA!
Or.... we are just being trolled, sigh, still, Best. Election. Ever....
Interesting comment about having hacked Podestas phone and Mac, that lends credibility that this stuff is genuine.
The idiot didn't even change all his passwords after it started leaking.
I found the message in Wikileaks. I'm not publishing it, though.
So why are WikiLeaks, Anonymous, Guccifer, etc... just releasing only Democrat emails - DNC, Clinton campaign, Podesta, etc..???
Bttt
This is so sweet. Poor old John was worrying about internal poll numbers just a little while ago!!
This one’s a doozy: The WaPo doing “fact checking” for the HRC campaign on the topic of “A Guide to the Allegations of Bill Clinton’s Womanizing”!
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5399
In reading the leaked emails, I was really struck by the amount of cell phone numbers that were included, private email addresses, business email addresses, and even Podesta’s (what looked like) financial accounts information.
Links to attorneys, government officials, people using private gmail instead of business accounts, reporters, etc etc.
As a non-tech person, it seems like that’s a LOT of information for people to get access to - thus exposing hundreds of people to the possibility of their own ‘hacked’ accounts, cell numbers, gmail, business mail, etc.
Yes? No?
“Shows Trump up big in their internal polling.”
How long ago? Was it just recently (a few days ago?) or months ago?
Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . . From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: sandynewman@gmail.com Date: 2012-02-11 11:45 Subject: Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . . We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up. I'll discuss with Tara. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is the other person to consult.
On 2/10/12, Sandy Newman wrote: >
Hi, John, > >
This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even > though 98% of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used > contraception has me thinking . . . There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in > which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and > the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the > Catholic church. Is contraceptive coverage an issue around which that could > happen. The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic > Hospital Association support of the Administration's new policy, together > with "the 98%" create an opportunity? > >
Of course, this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the > Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and > priests who count on it for their maintenance, etc. Even if the idea isn't > crazy, I don't qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about > how one would "plant the seeds of the revolution," or who would plant them. > Just wondering . . . > >
Hoping you're well, and getting to focus your time in the ways you want. > > Sandy > > Sandy Newman, President > Voices for Progress > 202.669.8754 > voicesforprogress.org >