Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WIKILEAKS BOMBSHELL: HILLARY CLINTON CAUGHT READING FROM SCRIPT DURING INTERVIEW! Given Q's B4hand
WIKILEAKS VIA REDDIT ^ | OCTOBER 11, 2016 | WIKILEAKS

Posted on 10/11/2016 11:35:13 PM PDT by proust

After colluding with Chris Hayes at MSNBC, Chris Hayes conducted a rehearsed "interview" with Hillary Clinton as word for word with the Wikileaks email.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uj0P0sD22M

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4274


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catowner; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: aces

I am worried that if they think Trump is going to win that they will execute a major op operation like a financial crisis or a terrorist attack that will scuttle the elections. Stock up on supplies soon.


41 posted on 10/12/2016 4:15:38 AM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: proust

Collusion!

Hillary is a phoney.


42 posted on 10/12/2016 4:54:35 AM PDT by Lopeover (The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Thanks for posting. The drone, Chris Hayes, working for queen B, Hillary Clinton, to program the hive.

November 8. Be there.


43 posted on 10/12/2016 5:02:39 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
It is now fair game to ask everyone in the media whether or not they ever colluded with Hillary.

Do you really believe they would admit it? They lie, they collude, whitewash, and omit anything they want. They sure as hell won't admit to being in cahoots with the bitch.

44 posted on 10/12/2016 6:06:40 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: proust

Thanks for posting.


45 posted on 10/12/2016 6:21:38 AM PDT by FR_addict (Ryan needs to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Stunning. I hope whoever did this will continue. Very well done. Thanks for posting.


46 posted on 10/12/2016 8:04:57 AM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proust

This is an amazing video. I always thought the press was in the bag for Hillary, but I had no idea it was at this level. They “staged” an interview with her. The American people are being played for fools. The people who control us (and the world) put bread and cirucuses out there to distract the sheeple, while they continual to screw us over and draw more and more power away from the people. It’s all a show for our benefit. The hate Trump becaue he won’t do their playacting games.

If there were any fairness and justice, Chris Hayes would have to resign over this, because he is obviously no journalist. Get this news out to people. Everyone should see this. It would be insane if the media has a shred of credibility left after this election.


47 posted on 10/12/2016 8:13:31 AM PDT by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

“Why is this a bombshell? No one who hasn’t decided on this election is going to find any use for this report.”

I sure hope you were joking or were too sleepy to think straight. This is proof positive that the media is an arm of Hillary’s campaign and that everything they put out about this election should be called into question. There are still a lot of people in this country who think the media puts out news instead of propaganda. Something as outrageous and blatantly dishonest as this should wake even the most naïve viewer up to the manipulation. There is no group of people (not the Dems, not the GOPe) who have damaged Trump more than the media, and nothing could help him more than the media being totally discredited, as they deserve to be.

It also calls into question whether Hillary believes anything she says. Her staffers created her answer and then had a long discussion about it. It was all fake in order to trick the viewers. Nothing sincere. Nothing legitimate.


48 posted on 10/12/2016 8:21:35 AM PDT by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: proust

Stupid Hillary!


49 posted on 10/12/2016 8:46:05 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Do you really believe they would admit it?

The point is to make them deny it.

Clinton will never admit to raping Juanita, but you still ask him the question.

50 posted on 10/12/2016 9:06:16 AM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
At some point, given all we know, you either think she is a corrupt and nasty person or you simply don’t care.

Bingo! And no one does care. Everyone's mind is made up already. The only questions are: what is the true October surprise that's coming (if anyone believes it was that tape they're stupid) and what impact will it have on the election.

Stuff like this (the "bombshell" here) will never be seen by anyone. Not on the MSM of course and not on the Internet. Why? Because some people don't want to tick off their Facebook "friends" by posting it there, others don't want to potentially lose their job by posting it there while others don't want to tick off their fellow church goers/relatives/real life friends by posting it there. Or anywhere else on the Internet that will have an impact on real people and their real decisions in real life.

Someone said upthread that this isn't the 1970's, the MSM doesn't control information anymore. That's true to a certain extent. They don't control the amount of info or kind of info one has easy access to anymore but leftists remain in control of news outlets that matter on the Internet, and guess what, outside of us political junkies on FR, individual blog sites that no one has heard of don't count to average Joe Voter. Such an average consumer (and I use that term properly) regards Facebook and Twitter as "alternative forms" of information. But guess what again: leftists control them!!

There is leftist control of content on Facebook and Twitter but also the controls I mentioned above which is the caution and outright fear imposed by all of one's "friends" (both offline and on) one's employer and one's social status in the community at large. It all still comes down to how many people are willing to put it all on the line for truth?

Not enough and that's the real problem.

51 posted on 10/12/2016 9:24:05 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Once you make the decision to cheat your way to elected office, you force your supporters into supporting a cheater.

But that’s not all.

You also force yourself to lie about the cheating, and to lie about the lying. And then you force your supporters into lying about the cheating, and lying about the lying.

Then your supporters have to lie about their own lying, and possibly about their own cheating if they are involved on that level.

In the end, both you and your supporters have self-identified as lying cheaters. Is it really worth it?


52 posted on 10/12/2016 10:31:31 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: proust

omg this is disgusting.

We’re turning into Japan.

Yeah, 99% of journalists have relationships so tight with the people they interview that the stuff that ends up printed is the result of COLLABORATION —the subject can specify what is printed in great detail. It’s usually unclear who is really writing the story, i.e. the story is more or less orchestrated by a public employee.

Not only that but journalists from different publications can meet later and coordinate what is printed in order to safeguard “press stability”. Yeah, that means across publications the content ends up almost completely THE SAME.

It’s a type of PRESS CARTEL. Can you imagine the WaPo calling up the NYT and contemplating if they should break their scoop..?

That’s why scandals when broken in Japan are always broken the the “illegitimate publications” —the J equivalents of The Star, etc, publications that end up with “Alien Space Baby Found in Watermelon” type stuff.

It appears WE ARE HEADED THERE.

There are a million great things about Japan, but prevalent patterns in mass media ARE NOT ONE OF THEM


53 posted on 10/12/2016 2:57:40 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Let me add here that there was ZERO press censorship in Japan during WW2 —it was ALL the product of informal pressure.

You can pull that off easily when it’s unclear where Da Gummint stops and where the media begins, see..?

In fact censorship of that unusual type is MUCH more intractable cuz it’s not WRITTEN DOWN; the tools to get it stopped DO NOT EXIST.

That means the whole Societal Train can run off the tracks much later, at a much higher speed, with much deadlier effects.

Like (you probably won’t believe this) guys can get into Nanking Beheading Competitions and nobody will stop them.


54 posted on 10/12/2016 3:01:38 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson