Posted on 09/27/2016 8:03:34 PM PDT by Mean Daddy
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is a controversial character. But there’s no denying the emails he has picked up from inside the Democrat Party are real, and he’s willing to expose Hillary Clinton.
Now, he’s announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department were actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.
Clinton has repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepoliticalinsider.com ...
You got it pretty well nailed down.
That’s serious enough.
What’s the ‘other bomb’?
I don’t think that most of the early voters that vote for Clinton care what she does or what is proven that she did.
Where are the survivors from Benghazi...the civilians? Who are they and why have they never been heard from?
Ah, yes; the matching plumbing vote. I'm puzzled, though, at the poor reception they gave Sarah. So the must be the plumbing plus ideology vote.
...THEY must be...
If I'm understanding all this correctly (and that's a big if), the underlying reason that Hillary wanted the back story of Benghazi to be held under a big lie of a videotape, is that Ambassador Stevens was a middleman of sorts in an arms running campaign into Syria, where arms from Libya (?) were funneled to precursor (to ISIS) rebel groups in Syria.
This might be stupid policy (or not), but I wouldn't think it would be treasonous.
(Her email server comes closer to that. Her deals with Russia re uranium are. Her husband's deals with China are. Other Clinton Foundation deals are. )
Somebody else can dissect and unwrap all this better than I can.
If most Americans supported Hillary her campaign would look like Obama's and Trump's combined. You couldn't find a venue large enough to contain the enthusiastic crowds.
In real life she can barely fill a high school gymnasium.
I would go celebrate if Hillary was an ISIS sex slave!
Wellll, I think I’d feel a bit sorry for ISIS.
That means BO is involved.
We have been involved in a WoT since W declared it.
Even if congress did not draft an official declaration of war, everyone in the country is aware of our Wot and especially our primary enemy Al Qaeda, even you want to split hairs.
The fact that Obama and his fascists supplied arms to Al Qaeda is the very definition of High Treason.
Now, you can split hairs all you want and blah blah blah. But guess what. You’re a fool to think this wasn’t aiding and abetting the enemy and committing High Treason.
But hey. Go ahead and split those hairs.
That’s how Hillary and Obama and the rest of the scumbag-lawyer-leftist politicians get their treasonous ways.
Indeed. Fast and furious is further evidence that the Criminal in Chief has no problem with illegally supplying our enemies with weaponry.
“That’s how Hillary and Obama and the rest of the scumbag-lawyer-leftist politicians get their treasonous ways.”
And that, good Ghost of Philip Marlowe, is my point.
Legally there is no war.
Libya was a huge threat to the region for many reasons. Qdaffi had backed the dinar with gold.A gold backed currency got the attention of all the NWO types who run hill/bama and they told them to get rid of him. Accordingly,They seeded terror types into Libya for two years into then assassinated Qdaffi, stole all his money assets and arms and began shuffling them all over the mideast to all the wrong types.Not to mention Benghazi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.