You have provided a lot of information, but that information is necessary to get the bigger picture. I am amazed at how effectively you have taken that information and condensed it down to the size you have.
Perhaps breaking that down into smaller segments, and calling them Part 1, Part 2, etc. might get more people involvedt. Do this by taking the five most extreme arguments that anyone could read in a few short minutes, to draw them in. With links to more? They would also have to be the ones most easily understood, or put into terms that make them easily understood, so that it would hit home to the largest possible crowd, and quickly. Instead of using the term quantum encryption, speak in general terms that most can understand, just encryption as an example.
But all-in-all I found what you did to be a remarkable job of research and presentation. In fact I think that it should be sent to news outlets to get wide exposure.
... Everyone ...
Please note Robert DeLong’s advice in post 29.
Whatever ‘grabs’ you — what tugs at you the most — please make a vanity. A few lines in your own words maybe, and then in your followup post [post 2] it’s easy to copy-paste the address to here:
China’s Conquest of Internet, ICANN + Quantum Encryption
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3473008/posts
It also helps to copy-paste this, the key word search for ‘ICANN’ ... key word addresses keep updating in real time:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/icann/index
... Everyone ...
Also, please feel free to copy-paste any of my ICANN / internet giveaway research.
God bless all of you for taking the time to read, ponder, and take action.
FRegards ....
Ditto.