Posted on 09/23/2016 12:39:12 PM PDT by glasseye
I knew it would come.
Believe me, as a former resident of D/FW . . . I am NOT a Mark Cuban fan.
Bookmark
I’m not even sure it would be helpful if they did stand together.
Cruz had trouble building a team against the internet giveaway despite having so much research and powerful witness testimony.
Other senators might bristle if Trump shows any signs of favoring Cruz.
Very late to the party, but welcome to the party. However, don’t expect to be given access to the VIP Room.
Now Cruz has a chance to repair the damage and get stronger than ever.
He can learn from all of this.
And I hope that Trump puts him on speed dial even if they don’t admit it in public. Cruz and his wife both are brilliant.
FRegards ....
This is the correct post. Please close the thread.
Don’t care. Too late.
His endorsement is too little too late. Like a self-serving general holding his forces back until the outcome has almost been decided.
Will he release his much vaunted ground troops to do the daily door to door knocking in critical battleground districts?
If not, then this is merely the gesture of undisciplined dog groveling to get his next meal and a warm bed. You know he'll turn on you first chance he gets if he senses an advantages.
I’m not a fan of Cruz personally [hated some of the phony ways he campaigned], but I AM a fan of his work regarding ICANN.
Bringing Rosenzweig as a professional witness for example.
ICANN Transition Even Endangers ‘.gov’ and ‘.mil’ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3469586/posts
http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/09-14-16-rosenzweig-testimony.
ICANN transition insider Paul Rosenzweig warns:
1. Foreign powers will “indisputably have increased influence”.
2. Transition a “leap in the dark”.
3. ICANN planning to move overseas.
4. ‘.gov’ and ‘.mil’ “not assured by any enforeable mechanism”.
Now could SOMEONE get that crybaby Sasse to please endorse him too?
What’s the shtick on Mike Lee?
FYI, the ONLY valid consideration for a SCOTUS nominee IMO is his faithful adherence to applying the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended to the facts of the particular case.
Guess Reince’s threat of withholding future support had some teeth in it.
Beck is in suicide watch. Hopefully Erickson is too.
I’m hoping that now Trump will personally tell people about ICANN, Hillary’s internet gatekeeper, what she’s always wanted.
I don’t know if he will tie it to her, but Madam Albright’s consulting firm assisted lobbying efforts for ICANN’s transition.
Also, the Clintons have been very chummy with China, and so has ICANN.
Cruz is DEAD-ON RIGHT about ICANN and helped expose their relationship with China.
I’ll post how easy it is to explain why ICANN is dangerous in a post to ‘all’.
FRegards ....
Whatever.
No one argues against Cruz and his Consitution knowledge and conservative bent if he served on the Court.
“I’ve got no use for Ted Cruz, I think he’s just trying to save his political hide, because the RNC has said to get on board or else.”
I think that’s Cruz’s real motivation. He’s an ambitious man and he will need Trump supporters when it’s HIS turn to run (good luck with that, Tedward)
Best to find out early lest someone have to deal with the stink.
I’m glad Ted did it but I’m not glad with Ted. He outed himself at an Corporatist Establishment front man by working so hard against Trump.
Just last month Cruz endorsed Corporatist RINO open borders cheap labor Marco Rubio.
Easy To Explain — WHY ICANN is dangerous
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3472522/posts
This is the quick way to explain why ICANN is so dangerous.
They essentially ‘govern’ the TLDs [top level domains].
Each TLD [such as .com or .org] runs its own ‘phone directory’.
And ICANN controls them through ‘Registry Operator Code of Conduct’.
Right now ICANN is subject to US law, mainly because its headquarters are in the US. But if ICANN’s contract isn’t renewed, it’s free to move overseas [which it secretly plans to] and modify its ‘Registry Operator Code of Conduct’ for each dot-com or dot-org or ...
... theoretically even our military websites.
From October on through to a republican president, there’s no telling how much the White House will coordinate with ICANN in the name of ‘no controlling legal authority’.
[In other words — Hillary will have her gatekeeper if she wins, and Obama might too for a few months.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.