Condi Rice and Madam Albright are both tied to the $2.5 million lobby effort to get ICANN’s internet ‘transition’ passed. [And evidence of ‘walking around money’.]
Who paid that kind of money to get ICANN’s internet “transition” passed???
Although all of it concerns me, this section including Hate Speech is what really concerns me regarding the future of Conservative Political Websites!
ICANN’s Secret Crusade
It’s quite simple really. Obama is running out the clock on a key contract. After that ...
A. They will ponder hate speech enforcement. With their power to delete website property, they can either fine or wipe out any website that the globalists and their drones get mad at.
B. They lied about staying in the US and plan to move overseas to bypass US law.
C. ICANN is more than ready for a cyber-war with the US.
They have the software [along with copyrights and experience] to do anything that ANY foreign government deems legal.
To oppose them with a new counter-ICANN in the US would lead to anarchy — the ultimate cyber-war. If Google sides with them, they would be an unbeatable team.
D. Even if we renew the contract with ICANN before October 1, I seriously doubt that Obama would lift a finger to prevent rogue members of ICANN from flying off anyway, but at least we would have the legal ‘high ground’ in international law.
E. ICANN’s lobbyists are even spreading misinformation that .mil and .gov sites will be protected. They are clearly keeping their options open to consider meddling with US federal and military websites in ways that would enrage us.
~~~
A. Hate Speech Oversight
After that ICANN is free to fly over to one or more other nations, bypass US jurisdiction, then what? They ponder ‘hate speech’ oversight, such as the Swedish Plan, a global group-hug against hate speech.
[link will be provided for more in-depth]
They have spoken with the French Senate and also had secret talks with China.
That’s all we know about. There have undoubtedly been many backdoor meetings in the past year or so all over the globe.
For example — The UN would want ICANN to ‘slant’ internet speech to validate the World Court to create a worldwide mandate to arrest US war heroes or politicians for crimes against humanity or crimes against nature [aka ‘global warming]. Even a future President. We could resist them militarily and be an ‘island fortress’, but foreign visits could be dangerous and trade talks could get ugly and sea mines could be ‘righteously’ laid along our ports. [For starters.]
Bottom line: free speech prevents a world of hurt.
Not only could ICANN regulate hate speech, they could also raise fees across the board which the UN or China or any other country could collect. [Domain name fees.]
~~~
‘Who paid that kind of money to get ICANN’s internet “transition” passed???’
ICANN makes good money — $600 million in the past three years through fees. For all I know there could be federal funding on top, and there could also be under-the-table contributions and informal money to them.
China was helping ICANN out in all manner of ways [note earlier post] which was one reason why Cruz Lankford and Mike Lee were sending them open letter questions. ICANN stalled them for answers BTW.