The article says that “earlier in September” Hillary had a 21 pt. lead over Trump.
It’s only mid-September now!
I hope Reuters’ prediction is correct but I don’t see how, with that kind of lead, Clinton could lose VT unless the fainting incident had more of an effect than I thought.
It can only mean one thing - Hillary’s numbers have collapsed.
If she has lost safe VT, we’re looking at a GOP landslide.
>>... unless the fainting incident had more of an effect than I thought.<<
I think the fainting incident had a huge effect, especially since it occurred on 9/11. People tie that sort of thing together, plus it looked like a lot more than “fainting” and a hell of a lot more than pneumonia.
Even the libs are wondering this time.
That “fainting incident” was anything but; she was stiff as a board & couldn’t control her leg & body...
the sec serv guys had to put her bodily into that van.
Look at the optics of it:
15th anniversary of 9-11
Resident of NY running for Prez
ISIS running rampant in the Mideast and elsewhere
Norks setting off nuke test
the world is much more dangerous now...
And the dem nominee is rendered unfit and unaware of surroundings, without any warning.