Posted on 09/16/2016 2:59:23 PM PDT by Biggirl
Why would the issue have come up in the 2004 senate race? There is no Constitutional birth issue for Congress.
Citizenship. Yes.
Residency for 9 years. Yes.
Inhabitant of state seeking to represent. Yes.
Birthplace. No.
Wow, that’s bad. Really bad.
I don’t know, but someone was mentioning it then.
I mentioned it yesterday when I heard it. Pissed me off so much, but couldn’t find a relevant thread, so I put it on one about Liary trashing the Donald.
Ever have one of those moments where you actually turn your head towards the radio because you heard something so outragious you almost question if you heard it right? Well, it was one of those.
Everyobody is wasting their time if they’re waiting for Mark to see Trump differently.
Mark said on Monday, “I am NOT a Trump supporter.” Mark said Hannity has invited him on his show several times, but Mark says he will not go on because he is not a Trump supporter.
Mark is a Rubio supporter and Ted Cruz supporter.
Mark was a Paul Ryan supporter and he was a friend of the program.
Mark was a Bush supporter.
Mark was a McCain and Mitt Romney supporter. Mark said in 2012 he had no tolerance for anyone who didn’t vote for Romney.
Support Donald Trump? No way, that is beneath Mark Levin.
Is anyone not voting or not voting for Trump and writing in Ted Cruz or going 3rd party? That’s ok with Mark. Mark says vote your conscience. The opposite of what he said for Mitt Romney in 2012.
Mark is voting for Trump but is ok with 4 more years of Obama because he’ll get to tell the Trump supporters like Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Sarah Palin, “See I told you so” and hawk more Caspert mattresses and Levin TV subscriptions.
No, he did not.
Levin kept telling that caller that Trump was not the radical extremist that Clinton. He kept trying to explain to the guy that Trump was "unreliable" on sticking to the conservative side of issues, but that Clinton was absolutely reliable to be an Alinsky Leftist who will destroy the country.
The caller kept trying to bait Levin by suggesting that Trump would say something offensive to a foreign dignitary, and Levin said maybe, but look at what Clinton has already done. She overthrew Gaddafy, that destabilized the Middle East, she sold our unarium to Russia for personal gain, she violated the Espionage Act by mishandling our Top Secrets, she accomplished nothing as a Senator, she failed with HillaryCare.
The caller again said "what if Trump offends a foreign leader" intimating that Trump would start a shooting war, so Levin stopped him and said "So, I can tell you're voting for Hillary, right?"
The guy said "No, I can't vote for her." So Levin asked "So you're voting for Trump?"
The guy then said "There's always the third party like Johnson..."
So an exasperated Levin said "Then vote third party" and hung up on him.
-PJ
-PJ
Levin said “Then vote third party” and hung up on him.
In 2012 he would have told the caller, “Commit suicide on your own pal. Get off my phone you big dope!” Voting 3rd party wasn’t an option and he had no tolerance for it back then. Mark was 100% committed to stopping Obama and the problem today is Mark is not 100% committed to stopping Hillary and to people voting properly in this election.
The "get off the phone" schtik comes out much earlier if Levin thinks he's being trolled. He may have been this time too, in hindsight, and was late to see it, but he spent real time trying to convince the guy to vote for Trump.
-PJ
His fan base is disappearing faster than Hillary’s and rightly so. Used to love the guy but won’t ever listen to him again.
I did not sense any exasperation on Levin’s part when he told young man to vote for Johnson. Levin does not, IMO, support Trump’s election as President. You may choose to listen to him, we will not.
You are correct.
Although I check this post occasionally, I no longer listen to that neocon hypocrite.
The far greater problem is that most of the congress critters and pundit prattlers are also neocon hypocrites.
I do not remember any of them - any of them! - taking a so-called principled stand against the severely (ha, ha, ha...) conservative Romney... you know, the guy who instituted communistic health care and literally provided the blueprint for the federalized version to Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, so that they could more easily usurp one-sixth of the national economy without anyone even reading the damnable thing?
No, that was all right, and we munchkins had to just hold our noses and commit principled suicide by voting for the crony capitalist.
A pox on them all.
Thanks for details. I’m not surprised I guess, but kind of shocked. I have been listening to Levin over ten years. I feel sorrow and disappointment about him now. I’m a very latecomer to Trump so I’ve understood Mark’s reluctance.
But, having decided, I’m not going to spend more time criticizing than supporting.
I have noticed since Conway and Bannon took over the campaign there’s been improvements all around. Great team.
Take your "Tokyo Rose" #NeverTrump shtick elsewhere...
Vote Trump!
Oh, and who is the "we" that you are speaking for?
-PJ
Oh, and who is the “we” that you are speaking for?”
We is spouse and I. We did not tune into Levin’s broadcast intentionally, turned on the radio when we were stuck in traffic and just happened that he was broadcasting on the station that came on. Was hoping that he had finally changed his tune on Trump and was now strongly supporting him but, in our opinion, apparently not so we tuned in another station.
Yeah! How dare he call our nominated jerk a jerk! The nerve,,,
Is this guy still on the air??? Why???
. Levin encouraged him to go for third party. Levin called Trump liberal - although one of the “old style liberals”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.